Loading…
Pharmacokinetics of Dolasetron after Oral and Intravenous Administration of Dolasetron Mesylate in Healthy Volunteers and Patients with Hepatic Dysfunction
In previous studies, dolasetron was shown to have both renal and hepatic elimination mechanisms. This study was conducted to determine the impact of varying degrees of hepatic dysfunction on the pharmacokinetics and safety of dolasetron and its reduced metabolites. Seventeen adults were studied: six...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of clinical pharmacology 1997-10, Vol.37 (10), p.926-936 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In previous studies, dolasetron was shown to have both renal and hepatic elimination mechanisms. This study was conducted to determine the impact of varying degrees of hepatic dysfunction on the pharmacokinetics and safety of dolasetron and its reduced metabolites. Seventeen adults were studied: six healthy volunteers (group I), seven patients with mild hepatic impairment (Child‐Pugh class A; group II), and four patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment (Child‐Pugh class B or C1; group III). Single 150‐mg doses of dolasetron mesylate were administered intravenously and orally, with a 7‐day washout period separating treatments. After intravenous administration, no differences were observed between healthy volunteers and patients with hepatic impairment in maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), areas under the plasma concentration—time curve (AUC), or elimination half‐life (t1/2) of intact dolasetron. No significant differences were found in Cmax, AUC, or apparent clearance (Clapp) of hydrodolasetron, the primary metabolite of dolasetron. The mean t1/2 increased from 6.87 hours in group I to 11.69 hours in group III. After oral administration, Clapp of hydrodolasetron decreased by 42%, and Cmax increased by 18% in patients with moderate to severe hepatic impairment. There were less changes in patients with mildly hepatic impairment. Total percentage of dose excreted as metabolites was similar for healthy volunteers and patients with hepatic impairment, although urinary metabolite profiles differed slightly. Dolasetron was well tolerated and there were no apparent differences in adverse effects between groups or treatments. Because hepatic impairment did not influence Clapp of hydrodolasetron after intravenous administration, and the range of plasma concentrations of hydrodolasetron after oral administration was not different from those observed in healthy volunteers, dosage adjustments are not recommended for patients with hepatic disease and normal renal function. J Clin Pharmacol 1997;37:926–936. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0091-2700 1552-4604 |
DOI: | 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1997.tb04267.x |