Loading…
The impact of fetal compromise on outcome at the border of viability
OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to evaluate the impact of fetal compromise on the outcome of borderline viable babies. STUDY DESIGN: All 142 babies born in our hospital from 1990 to 1995 with a gestational age of 23 to 25 weeks were included. Fetal compromise was considered present if one of the following w...
Saved in:
Published in: | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1998-05, Vol.178 (5), p.909-915 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to evaluate the impact of fetal compromise on the outcome of borderline viable babies.
STUDY DESIGN: All 142 babies born in our hospital from 1990 to 1995 with a gestational age of 23 to 25 weeks were included. Fetal compromise was considered present if one of the following was documented: a major anomaly, congenital sepsis, chronic intrauterine infection, intrauterine drug exposure, congenital anemia, severe growth restriction, fetal acidosis, or cardiorespiratory and neurologic depression in the delivery room.
RESULTS: The 43 babies who had at least one cause of fetal compromise had a lower birth weight (
p < 0.001), but there were no other differences in demographics or complications of prematurity. The survival rate was significantly better for babies free of fetal compromise (75% vs 33%,
p < 0.001), particularly for babies born at 23 weeks of gestation (75% vs 6%,
p < 0.001). For surviving babies free of fetal compromise, the outcome at 23 weeks was comparable to that at 24 to 25 weeks for major causes of long-term neurologic morbidity.
CONCLUSIONS: Like advancing gestational age and increasing birth weight, the absence of fetal compromise has a major beneficial impact on the outcome of borderline viable babies that might be important when decisions are made about the appropriate level of support. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178:909-15.) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9378 1097-6868 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70522-8 |