Imbalanced biphasic electrical stimulation : muscle tissue damage

• Published in: Annals of biomedical engineering 1990-01, Vol.18 (4), p.407-425
• Main Authors: SCHEINER, A, MORTIMER, J. T, ROESSMANN, U
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Biological and medical sciences; Cats; Electric Injuries - etiology; Electric Injuries - pathology; Electric Stimulation - adverse effects; Electrodes; Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects); Medical sciences; Muscles - pathology; Necrosis - etiology
• ISSN: 0090-6964; 1573-9686
• DOI: 10.1007/BF02364157

The effects of imbalanced biphasic stimulation were studied on cat skeletal muscle to determine if greater charge densities can be safely used than with balanced or monophasic stimulation. The results of the study indicate that imbalanced biphasic stimulation can be tolerated safely by tissue at or below a net dc current density of 35 microA/mm2 and not safely tolerated at or above a net dc current of 50 microA/mm2. Monophasic stimulation has been shown to be safe at or below net dc current levels of 10 microA/mm2 and in these studies we found it was not safe at or above net dc current levels of 20 microA/mm2. Stimuli were applied to muscles via coiled wire intramuscular electrodes using a regulated current source. Since the safe average current density was higher for imbalanced biphasic stimulation than for monophasic stimulation, this suggests that: (a) pH change is not the primary reaction causing tissue damage and (b) the damaging electrochemical process that takes place during a cathodic stimulation pulse can be reversed by an anodic pulse having substantially less charge than its companion cathodic pulse. We conclude that greater cathodic charge densities can be safely employed with imbalanced biphasic stimulation than with either monophasic stimulation or balanced charge biphasic stimulation.