Loading…
Local variability of stand structural features in beech dominated natural forests of Central Europe: Implications for sampling
▶ Local variability of natural stands and appropriate sampling is often neglected. ▶ Our analyses are based on extensive datasets (in total about 29,000 trees on 107 ha). ▶ Variability of estimates in relation to plot sizes follows function y = a × x b . ▶ Min. numbers of plots and total sampling ar...
Saved in:
Published in: | Forest ecology and management 2010-12, Vol.260 (12), p.2196-2203 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | ▶ Local variability of natural stands and appropriate sampling is often neglected. ▶ Our analyses are based on extensive datasets (in total about 29,000 trees on 107
ha). ▶ Variability of estimates in relation to plot sizes follows function
y
=
a
×
x
b
. ▶ Min. numbers of plots and total sampling area for proper estimates were calculated. ▶ Range of historical and recent studies have been based on insufficient datasets.
Current knowledge of the within-site variability of major stand structural features in beech dominated natural forests is limited. Numerous studies have used just several small plots for characterizations of natural stands, but this may lead to generalizations based on unreliable results. This study shows how major stand structural features vary at the local scale, and how suitable sampling may reflect this variability. Stem position maps of three natural forests in the Czech Republic (Zofin 71
ha, Salajka 19
ha and Zakova hora 17
ha) were used. Each vector stem position map representing all live and dead trees with DBH
≥
10
cm was intensively analyzed using square sample plots of different sizes (10
×
10
m; 20
×
20
m; 30
×
30
m; 50
×
50
m; 100
×
100
m; 140
×
140
m and 200
×
200
m). Basic statistics (mean, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, min., and max.) were calculated for every plot size and each of six major stand features: density, basal area and volume of living trees, volume of course woody debris, total volume and proportion of course woody debris in total volume.
As expected, the local relative variability of major stand structural features decreased with increasing plot size. For particular stand features, the observed trend was expressed by significant regression models (
y
=
a
×
x
b
) with high coefficients of determination across all study sites. The results further show that even hectare-to-hectare values are still highly variable; e.g. the volume stock of living trees can range from 474 to 1049
m
3/ha within one study site. Hence, single samples of 1
ha can be poorly representative. We also calculated the minimal number of plots and total sampled area required for estimations of major stand features to within 20% (±10%) of the mean with 95% confidence for particular plot sizes. It appears that plot sizes between 0.01 and 0.09
ha would be the most efficient for sampling the above-mentioned variables in European beech-dominated natural forests. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0378-1127 1872-7042 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.09.020 |