Loading…

weak cation‐exchange monolith as stationary phase for the separation of peptide diastereomers by CEC

A CEC weak cation‐exchange monolith has been prepared by in situ polymerization of acrylamide, methylenebisacrylamide and 4‐acrylamidobutyric acid in a decanol-dimethylsulfoxide mixture as porogen. The columns were evaluated by SEM and characterized with regard to the separation of diastereomers and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of separation science 2011, Vol.34 (1), p.64-69
Main Authors: Ludewig, Ronny, Nietzsche, Sandor, Scriba, Gerhard K.E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A CEC weak cation‐exchange monolith has been prepared by in situ polymerization of acrylamide, methylenebisacrylamide and 4‐acrylamidobutyric acid in a decanol-dimethylsulfoxide mixture as porogen. The columns were evaluated by SEM and characterized with regard to the separation of diastereomers and α/β‐isomers of aspartyl peptides. Column preparation was reproducible as evidenced by comparison of the analyte retention times of several columns prepared simultaneously. Analyte separation was achieved using mobile phases consisting of acidic phosphate buffer and ACN. Under these conditions the peptides migrated due to their electrophoretic mobility but the EOF also contributed as driving force as a function of the pH of the mobile phase due to increasing dissociation of the carboxyl groups of the polymer. Raising the pH of the mobile phase also resulted in deprotonation of the peptides reducing analyte mobility. Due to these mechanisms each pair of diastereomeric peptides displayed the highest resolution at a different pH of the buffer component of the mobile phase. Comparing the weak‐cation exchange monolith to an RP monolith and a strong cation‐exchange monolith different elution order of some peptide diastereomers was observed, clearly illustrating that interactions with the stationary phase contribute to the CEC separations.
ISSN:1615-9306
1615-9314
DOI:10.1002/jssc.201000616