Loading…
Current practices in determining amnionicity and chorionicity in multiple gestations
Objective To evaluate the accuracy of amnionicity and chorionicity (A/C) diagnosis of referral physicians and a tertiary care center as compared to histopathologic diagnosis. Method A retrospective study of 289 multi‐fetal gestations was performed comparing A/C diagnoses of referring physicians, a t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Prenatal diagnosis 2011-01, Vol.31 (1), p.125-130 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objective
To evaluate the accuracy of amnionicity and chorionicity (A/C) diagnosis of referral physicians and a tertiary care center as compared to histopathologic diagnosis.
Method
A retrospective study of 289 multi‐fetal gestations was performed comparing A/C diagnoses of referring physicians, a tertiary care center, and histopathology.
Results
Two hundred and eighty‐nine multi‐fetal pregnancies were referred for evaluation; only 43.6% (126/289) carried an accurate diagnosis of A/C before tertiary care center evaluation. The tertiary care center accurately identified A/C in 94.8% (274/289) overall and 100% in first trimester twins and triplets. Referrals with an unspecified A/C diagnosis included 46.1% (113/245) twins and 64.1% (25/39) triplets.
Conclusion
Accurate diagnosis of A/C can be obtained by the early assessment of key sonographic findings. Referral providers are less accurate at determining A/C of mutifetal gestation when compared to a tertiary center, suggesting that an emphasis should be placed on enhancing these diagnostic skills in the general community or encouraging referral when diagnosis is ambiguous. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0197-3851 1097-0223 |
DOI: | 10.1002/pd.2663 |