The Theory of International Politics? An Analysis of Neorealist Theory

In recent years a number of writers have defended and attacked various features of structural, or neo-realist theories of international politics. Few, however, have quarrelled with one of the most foundational features of neorealist theory: its assumptions about the nature of science and scientific...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human studies 1998-04, Vol.21 (2), p.157-186
Main Author: Topper, Keith
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Anarchy
Energy resources
Foreign affairs
Foucault, Michel
Historians
Human sciences
International politics
International Relations
International relations theory
Neorealism
Philosophy of science
Political power
Political science
Political theory
Politics
Power
Prototypes
Realism (Philosophy)
Reductionism
Science
Scientific thought
Social Power
Social Theories
Theoretical Problems
Theory
Vietnam War
Waltz, Kenneth (1924-2013)
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In recent years a number of writers have defended and attacked various features of structural, or neo-realist theories of international politics. Few, however, have quarrelled with one of the most foundational features of neorealist theory: its assumptions about the nature of science and scientific theories. In this essay I assess the views of science underlying much neorelist theory, especially as they are articulated in the work of Kenneth Waltz. I argue not only that neorealist theories rest on assumptions about science and theory that have been questioned by postpositivist philosophers and historians of science, but also that the failure to consider the work of these writers yields theories of international politics that are deficient in several respects: they are "weak" theories in the sense that they cannot illuminate crucial features of international politics, they presuppose and sustain a narrow view of power and power relations, they reify practices and relations in the international arena and they offer little promise of producing the sort of "Copernican Revolution" for which Waltz called (or, more modestly, even a minimally satisfactory theory of international politics). In light of these shortcomings, I sketch an alternative approach to the study of international affairs, one that has been termed "prototype studies." I contend that such an approach provides scholars with a rigorous way of studying international politics, without being a theoretical science.
ISSN:0163-8548
1572-851X
DOI:10.1023/A:1005347603731