Loading…
Associative sexual responses in relation to sexual arousal, guilt, and external approval contingencies
Studied associative responses to double entendre words in relation to: (1) individual differences in sex-guilt, (2) differing expectancies for external censure, and (3) different degrees of sexual stimulation. The inhibitory effects of guilt and censure expectations under conditions of sexual arousa...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of personality and social psychology 1968-10, Vol.10 (2), p.142-147 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a362t-9e7456516956c7d05e4e7b9f960a83342750e9d266fce16b051c509a1f38cba13 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 147 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 142 |
container_title | Journal of personality and social psychology |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Galbraith, Gary G Mosher, Donald L |
description | Studied associative responses to double entendre words in relation to: (1) individual differences in sex-guilt, (2) differing expectancies for external censure, and (3) different degrees of sexual stimulation. The inhibitory effects of guilt and censure expectations under conditions of sexual arousal were the primary foci of interest. Results showed that (1) sexual responses were inhibited by sex-guilt, (2) responses of low sex-guilt Ss shifted as external censure contingencies changed, but no corresponding shifts occurred in the responses of high guilt Ss, (3) sexual stimulation led to increased sexual responsiveness in the low guilt group, and (4) sex-guilt differences were related to differences in awareness of the sexual meaning of double entendre words. Ss were 168 college males. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/h0026386 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85030075</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1295902926</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a362t-9e7456516956c7d05e4e7b9f960a83342750e9d266fce16b051c509a1f38cba13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9r3DAQxUVoSTd_oF-gYJpQeojbkWTJ1jGEpC0EemnOQqsdpwpeydXYIfn2kdlND4WepNH78Xijx9h7Dl84yPbrbwChZacP2IobaWouuXrDVuVV1FLx5h07InoAgEYJccgOVSuUAbli_SVR8sFN4RErwqfZDVVGGlMkpCrEMgxFTLGa0qvucprJDRfV_RyG6aJycVPh04Q5LuI45vRYLj7FKcR7jD4gnbC3vRsIT_fnMbu7uf519b2-_fntx9Xlbe2kFlNtsG2UVlwbpX27AYUNtmvTGw2uk7IRrQI0G6F175HrNSjuFRjHe9n5tePymH3a-ZYQf2akyW4DeRwGF7GEtp0CCdCqAn78B3xI87IAWc0b0XXa6AKd_Q_iwpQPFEYs1Ocd5XMiytjbMYety8-Wg13asa_tFPTD3nBeb3HzF9zXUfTzne5GZ0d69i5PwQ9IZRgXO2FLOPkCUUKVSQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614288696</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Associative sexual responses in relation to sexual arousal, guilt, and external approval contingencies</title><source>PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Galbraith, Gary G ; Mosher, Donald L</creator><creatorcontrib>Galbraith, Gary G ; Mosher, Donald L</creatorcontrib><description>Studied associative responses to double entendre words in relation to: (1) individual differences in sex-guilt, (2) differing expectancies for external censure, and (3) different degrees of sexual stimulation. The inhibitory effects of guilt and censure expectations under conditions of sexual arousal were the primary foci of interest. Results showed that (1) sexual responses were inhibited by sex-guilt, (2) responses of low sex-guilt Ss shifted as external censure contingencies changed, but no corresponding shifts occurred in the responses of high guilt Ss, (3) sexual stimulation led to increased sexual responsiveness in the low guilt group, and (4) sex-guilt differences were related to differences in awareness of the sexual meaning of double entendre words. Ss were 168 college males.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0026386</identifier><identifier>PMID: 5725903</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Arousal ; Association ; Guilt ; Human ; Humans ; Male ; Physiological Arousal ; Reinforcement (Psychology) ; Semantics ; Sex ; Sexual Behavior ; Social Approval ; Stimulation ; Word Associations</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality and social psychology, 1968-10, Vol.10 (2), p.142-147</ispartof><rights>1968 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1968, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a362t-9e7456516956c7d05e4e7b9f960a83342750e9d266fce16b051c509a1f38cba13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5725903$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Galbraith, Gary G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosher, Donald L</creatorcontrib><title>Associative sexual responses in relation to sexual arousal, guilt, and external approval contingencies</title><title>Journal of personality and social psychology</title><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><description>Studied associative responses to double entendre words in relation to: (1) individual differences in sex-guilt, (2) differing expectancies for external censure, and (3) different degrees of sexual stimulation. The inhibitory effects of guilt and censure expectations under conditions of sexual arousal were the primary foci of interest. Results showed that (1) sexual responses were inhibited by sex-guilt, (2) responses of low sex-guilt Ss shifted as external censure contingencies changed, but no corresponding shifts occurred in the responses of high guilt Ss, (3) sexual stimulation led to increased sexual responsiveness in the low guilt group, and (4) sex-guilt differences were related to differences in awareness of the sexual meaning of double entendre words. Ss were 168 college males.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Arousal</subject><subject>Association</subject><subject>Guilt</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Physiological Arousal</subject><subject>Reinforcement (Psychology)</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior</subject><subject>Social Approval</subject><subject>Stimulation</subject><subject>Word Associations</subject><issn>0022-3514</issn><issn>1939-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1968</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU9r3DAQxUVoSTd_oF-gYJpQeojbkWTJ1jGEpC0EemnOQqsdpwpeydXYIfn2kdlND4WepNH78Xijx9h7Dl84yPbrbwChZacP2IobaWouuXrDVuVV1FLx5h07InoAgEYJccgOVSuUAbli_SVR8sFN4RErwqfZDVVGGlMkpCrEMgxFTLGa0qvucprJDRfV_RyG6aJycVPh04Q5LuI45vRYLj7FKcR7jD4gnbC3vRsIT_fnMbu7uf519b2-_fntx9Xlbe2kFlNtsG2UVlwbpX27AYUNtmvTGw2uk7IRrQI0G6F175HrNSjuFRjHe9n5tePymH3a-ZYQf2akyW4DeRwGF7GEtp0CCdCqAn78B3xI87IAWc0b0XXa6AKd_Q_iwpQPFEYs1Ocd5XMiytjbMYety8-Wg13asa_tFPTD3nBeb3HzF9zXUfTzne5GZ0d69i5PwQ9IZRgXO2FLOPkCUUKVSQ</recordid><startdate>196810</startdate><enddate>196810</enddate><creator>Galbraith, Gary G</creator><creator>Mosher, Donald L</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>196810</creationdate><title>Associative sexual responses in relation to sexual arousal, guilt, and external approval contingencies</title><author>Galbraith, Gary G ; Mosher, Donald L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a362t-9e7456516956c7d05e4e7b9f960a83342750e9d266fce16b051c509a1f38cba13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1968</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Arousal</topic><topic>Association</topic><topic>Guilt</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Physiological Arousal</topic><topic>Reinforcement (Psychology)</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior</topic><topic>Social Approval</topic><topic>Stimulation</topic><topic>Word Associations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Galbraith, Gary G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosher, Donald L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Galbraith, Gary G</au><au>Mosher, Donald L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Associative sexual responses in relation to sexual arousal, guilt, and external approval contingencies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><date>1968-10</date><risdate>1968</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>142</spage><epage>147</epage><pages>142-147</pages><issn>0022-3514</issn><eissn>1939-1315</eissn><abstract>Studied associative responses to double entendre words in relation to: (1) individual differences in sex-guilt, (2) differing expectancies for external censure, and (3) different degrees of sexual stimulation. The inhibitory effects of guilt and censure expectations under conditions of sexual arousal were the primary foci of interest. Results showed that (1) sexual responses were inhibited by sex-guilt, (2) responses of low sex-guilt Ss shifted as external censure contingencies changed, but no corresponding shifts occurred in the responses of high guilt Ss, (3) sexual stimulation led to increased sexual responsiveness in the low guilt group, and (4) sex-guilt differences were related to differences in awareness of the sexual meaning of double entendre words. Ss were 168 college males.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>5725903</pmid><doi>10.1037/h0026386</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3514 |
ispartof | Journal of personality and social psychology, 1968-10, Vol.10 (2), p.142-147 |
issn | 0022-3514 1939-1315 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85030075 |
source | PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Analysis of Variance Arousal Association Guilt Human Humans Male Physiological Arousal Reinforcement (Psychology) Semantics Sex Sexual Behavior Social Approval Stimulation Word Associations |
title | Associative sexual responses in relation to sexual arousal, guilt, and external approval contingencies |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T18%3A04%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Associative%20sexual%20responses%20in%20relation%20to%20sexual%20arousal,%20guilt,%20and%20external%20approval%20contingencies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20and%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Galbraith,%20Gary%20G&rft.date=1968-10&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=142&rft.epage=147&rft.pages=142-147&rft.issn=0022-3514&rft.eissn=1939-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0026386&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1295902926%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a362t-9e7456516956c7d05e4e7b9f960a83342750e9d266fce16b051c509a1f38cba13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614288696&rft_id=info:pmid/5725903&rfr_iscdi=true |