Loading…

Associative sexual responses in relation to sexual arousal, guilt, and external approval contingencies

Studied associative responses to double entendre words in relation to: (1) individual differences in sex-guilt, (2) differing expectancies for external censure, and (3) different degrees of sexual stimulation. The inhibitory effects of guilt and censure expectations under conditions of sexual arousa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of personality and social psychology 1968-10, Vol.10 (2), p.142-147
Main Authors: Galbraith, Gary G, Mosher, Donald L
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a362t-9e7456516956c7d05e4e7b9f960a83342750e9d266fce16b051c509a1f38cba13
cites
container_end_page 147
container_issue 2
container_start_page 142
container_title Journal of personality and social psychology
container_volume 10
creator Galbraith, Gary G
Mosher, Donald L
description Studied associative responses to double entendre words in relation to: (1) individual differences in sex-guilt, (2) differing expectancies for external censure, and (3) different degrees of sexual stimulation. The inhibitory effects of guilt and censure expectations under conditions of sexual arousal were the primary foci of interest. Results showed that (1) sexual responses were inhibited by sex-guilt, (2) responses of low sex-guilt Ss shifted as external censure contingencies changed, but no corresponding shifts occurred in the responses of high guilt Ss, (3) sexual stimulation led to increased sexual responsiveness in the low guilt group, and (4) sex-guilt differences were related to differences in awareness of the sexual meaning of double entendre words. Ss were 168 college males.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/h0026386
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85030075</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1295902926</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a362t-9e7456516956c7d05e4e7b9f960a83342750e9d266fce16b051c509a1f38cba13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9r3DAQxUVoSTd_oF-gYJpQeojbkWTJ1jGEpC0EemnOQqsdpwpeydXYIfn2kdlND4WepNH78Xijx9h7Dl84yPbrbwChZacP2IobaWouuXrDVuVV1FLx5h07InoAgEYJccgOVSuUAbli_SVR8sFN4RErwqfZDVVGGlMkpCrEMgxFTLGa0qvucprJDRfV_RyG6aJycVPh04Q5LuI45vRYLj7FKcR7jD4gnbC3vRsIT_fnMbu7uf519b2-_fntx9Xlbe2kFlNtsG2UVlwbpX27AYUNtmvTGw2uk7IRrQI0G6F175HrNSjuFRjHe9n5tePymH3a-ZYQf2akyW4DeRwGF7GEtp0CCdCqAn78B3xI87IAWc0b0XXa6AKd_Q_iwpQPFEYs1Ocd5XMiytjbMYety8-Wg13asa_tFPTD3nBeb3HzF9zXUfTzne5GZ0d69i5PwQ9IZRgXO2FLOPkCUUKVSQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614288696</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Associative sexual responses in relation to sexual arousal, guilt, and external approval contingencies</title><source>PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Galbraith, Gary G ; Mosher, Donald L</creator><creatorcontrib>Galbraith, Gary G ; Mosher, Donald L</creatorcontrib><description>Studied associative responses to double entendre words in relation to: (1) individual differences in sex-guilt, (2) differing expectancies for external censure, and (3) different degrees of sexual stimulation. The inhibitory effects of guilt and censure expectations under conditions of sexual arousal were the primary foci of interest. Results showed that (1) sexual responses were inhibited by sex-guilt, (2) responses of low sex-guilt Ss shifted as external censure contingencies changed, but no corresponding shifts occurred in the responses of high guilt Ss, (3) sexual stimulation led to increased sexual responsiveness in the low guilt group, and (4) sex-guilt differences were related to differences in awareness of the sexual meaning of double entendre words. Ss were 168 college males.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/h0026386</identifier><identifier>PMID: 5725903</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Arousal ; Association ; Guilt ; Human ; Humans ; Male ; Physiological Arousal ; Reinforcement (Psychology) ; Semantics ; Sex ; Sexual Behavior ; Social Approval ; Stimulation ; Word Associations</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality and social psychology, 1968-10, Vol.10 (2), p.142-147</ispartof><rights>1968 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1968, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a362t-9e7456516956c7d05e4e7b9f960a83342750e9d266fce16b051c509a1f38cba13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5725903$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Galbraith, Gary G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosher, Donald L</creatorcontrib><title>Associative sexual responses in relation to sexual arousal, guilt, and external approval contingencies</title><title>Journal of personality and social psychology</title><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><description>Studied associative responses to double entendre words in relation to: (1) individual differences in sex-guilt, (2) differing expectancies for external censure, and (3) different degrees of sexual stimulation. The inhibitory effects of guilt and censure expectations under conditions of sexual arousal were the primary foci of interest. Results showed that (1) sexual responses were inhibited by sex-guilt, (2) responses of low sex-guilt Ss shifted as external censure contingencies changed, but no corresponding shifts occurred in the responses of high guilt Ss, (3) sexual stimulation led to increased sexual responsiveness in the low guilt group, and (4) sex-guilt differences were related to differences in awareness of the sexual meaning of double entendre words. Ss were 168 college males.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Arousal</subject><subject>Association</subject><subject>Guilt</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Physiological Arousal</subject><subject>Reinforcement (Psychology)</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sexual Behavior</subject><subject>Social Approval</subject><subject>Stimulation</subject><subject>Word Associations</subject><issn>0022-3514</issn><issn>1939-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1968</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kU9r3DAQxUVoSTd_oF-gYJpQeojbkWTJ1jGEpC0EemnOQqsdpwpeydXYIfn2kdlND4WepNH78Xijx9h7Dl84yPbrbwChZacP2IobaWouuXrDVuVV1FLx5h07InoAgEYJccgOVSuUAbli_SVR8sFN4RErwqfZDVVGGlMkpCrEMgxFTLGa0qvucprJDRfV_RyG6aJycVPh04Q5LuI45vRYLj7FKcR7jD4gnbC3vRsIT_fnMbu7uf519b2-_fntx9Xlbe2kFlNtsG2UVlwbpX27AYUNtmvTGw2uk7IRrQI0G6F175HrNSjuFRjHe9n5tePymH3a-ZYQf2akyW4DeRwGF7GEtp0CCdCqAn78B3xI87IAWc0b0XXa6AKd_Q_iwpQPFEYs1Ocd5XMiytjbMYety8-Wg13asa_tFPTD3nBeb3HzF9zXUfTzne5GZ0d69i5PwQ9IZRgXO2FLOPkCUUKVSQ</recordid><startdate>196810</startdate><enddate>196810</enddate><creator>Galbraith, Gary G</creator><creator>Mosher, Donald L</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>GHEHK</scope><scope>IZSXY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>196810</creationdate><title>Associative sexual responses in relation to sexual arousal, guilt, and external approval contingencies</title><author>Galbraith, Gary G ; Mosher, Donald L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a362t-9e7456516956c7d05e4e7b9f960a83342750e9d266fce16b051c509a1f38cba13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1968</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Arousal</topic><topic>Association</topic><topic>Guilt</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Physiological Arousal</topic><topic>Reinforcement (Psychology)</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sexual Behavior</topic><topic>Social Approval</topic><topic>Stimulation</topic><topic>Word Associations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Galbraith, Gary G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosher, Donald L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 08</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 30</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Galbraith, Gary G</au><au>Mosher, Donald L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Associative sexual responses in relation to sexual arousal, guilt, and external approval contingencies</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><date>1968-10</date><risdate>1968</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>142</spage><epage>147</epage><pages>142-147</pages><issn>0022-3514</issn><eissn>1939-1315</eissn><abstract>Studied associative responses to double entendre words in relation to: (1) individual differences in sex-guilt, (2) differing expectancies for external censure, and (3) different degrees of sexual stimulation. The inhibitory effects of guilt and censure expectations under conditions of sexual arousal were the primary foci of interest. Results showed that (1) sexual responses were inhibited by sex-guilt, (2) responses of low sex-guilt Ss shifted as external censure contingencies changed, but no corresponding shifts occurred in the responses of high guilt Ss, (3) sexual stimulation led to increased sexual responsiveness in the low guilt group, and (4) sex-guilt differences were related to differences in awareness of the sexual meaning of double entendre words. Ss were 168 college males.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>5725903</pmid><doi>10.1037/h0026386</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3514
ispartof Journal of personality and social psychology, 1968-10, Vol.10 (2), p.142-147
issn 0022-3514
1939-1315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85030075
source PsycARTICLES
subjects Analysis of Variance
Arousal
Association
Guilt
Human
Humans
Male
Physiological Arousal
Reinforcement (Psychology)
Semantics
Sex
Sexual Behavior
Social Approval
Stimulation
Word Associations
title Associative sexual responses in relation to sexual arousal, guilt, and external approval contingencies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T18%3A04%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Associative%20sexual%20responses%20in%20relation%20to%20sexual%20arousal,%20guilt,%20and%20external%20approval%20contingencies&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20and%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Galbraith,%20Gary%20G&rft.date=1968-10&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=142&rft.epage=147&rft.pages=142-147&rft.issn=0022-3514&rft.eissn=1939-1315&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/h0026386&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1295902926%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a362t-9e7456516956c7d05e4e7b9f960a83342750e9d266fce16b051c509a1f38cba13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614288696&rft_id=info:pmid/5725903&rfr_iscdi=true