Loading…
Not "Capitalizing" on Social Capitalization Interactions: The Role of Attachment Insecurity
Capitalization interactions, in which partners share positive events, typically produce positive relationship outcomes (Gable, Gonzaga, & Strachman, 2006). However, the limiting conditions of these interactions have not been examined. In this study, 101 dating couples discussed a positive event...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of family psychology 2011-02, Vol.25 (1), p.77-85 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-fbd79eb70aa6d3813a06ed81c4078e09388724508dccb1024a9bf9cfbb6285073 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 85 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 77 |
container_title | Journal of family psychology |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Shallcross, Sandra L Howland, Maryhope Bemis, Jenna Simpson, Jeffry A Frazier, Patricia |
description | Capitalization interactions, in which partners share positive events, typically produce positive relationship outcomes (Gable, Gonzaga, & Strachman, 2006). However, the limiting conditions of these interactions have not been examined. In this study, 101 dating couples discussed a positive event in the life of each partner. Ratings of perceived responsiveness were made by both the romantic partner who disclosed a positive event and his/her responding partner. Trained observers then rated each videotaped interaction. More avoidantly attached responders reported being and were rated by coders as less responsive, particularly if their disclosing partners were more anxiously attached. Avoidantly attached individuals also underestimated their partners' responsiveness relative to observer ratings. Anxious responders underestimated their own responsiveness when their disclosing partners were more avoidantly attached. These results indicate that insecurely attached individuals are relatively less likely to be responsive and to perceive responsiveness in capitalization interactions than are more securely attached individuals. This is especially true when highly anxious and highly avoidant individuals are relationship partners. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/a0021876 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_854566636</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1023096339</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-fbd79eb70aa6d3813a06ed81c4078e09388724508dccb1024a9bf9cfbb6285073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0U1rFDEYB_Agil2r4CeQYUEUYTRvkxdvZam1UCpoPXkIz2QyNmVmMiaZw_rpm6XbVjyUkkNC-PH8E_4IvSb4I8FMfgKMKVFSPEEropmuCdXsKVphpVnNKMYH6EVKVxgTzpR6jg4ooURjyVbo13nI1XoDs88w-L9--r2uwlT9CNbDUN3dQ_bl9nTKLoLdndPn6uLSVd_D4KrQV0c5g70c3ZQLSs4u0eftS_SshyG5V_v9EP38cnyx-VqffTs53Ryd1cCFzHXfdlK7VmIA0TFFGGDhOkUsx1I5rMuTJeUNVp21LcGUg257bfu2FVQ15ReH6N3N3DmGP4tL2Yw-WTcMMLmwJKMa3gghmCjy_YOyTGdYC8b04yhtVLPLX_9Hr8ISp_LlEq05l4TzBxFvmCZS_RNqY0gput7M0Y8QtyXO7Jo2t00X-mY_b2lH193B22oLeLsHkCwMfYTJ-nTvSmRZO_fhxsEMZk5bCzF7O7hUSoylUNPDaGhjiJGSXQPiQbvb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>845391789</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Not "Capitalizing" on Social Capitalization Interactions: The Role of Attachment Insecurity</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Shallcross, Sandra L ; Howland, Maryhope ; Bemis, Jenna ; Simpson, Jeffry A ; Frazier, Patricia</creator><contributor>Kaslow, Nadine J</contributor><creatorcontrib>Shallcross, Sandra L ; Howland, Maryhope ; Bemis, Jenna ; Simpson, Jeffry A ; Frazier, Patricia ; Kaslow, Nadine J</creatorcontrib><description>Capitalization interactions, in which partners share positive events, typically produce positive relationship outcomes (Gable, Gonzaga, & Strachman, 2006). However, the limiting conditions of these interactions have not been examined. In this study, 101 dating couples discussed a positive event in the life of each partner. Ratings of perceived responsiveness were made by both the romantic partner who disclosed a positive event and his/her responding partner. Trained observers then rated each videotaped interaction. More avoidantly attached responders reported being and were rated by coders as less responsive, particularly if their disclosing partners were more anxiously attached. Avoidantly attached individuals also underestimated their partners' responsiveness relative to observer ratings. Anxious responders underestimated their own responsiveness when their disclosing partners were more avoidantly attached. These results indicate that insecurely attached individuals are relatively less likely to be responsive and to perceive responsiveness in capitalization interactions than are more securely attached individuals. This is especially true when highly anxious and highly avoidant individuals are relationship partners.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0893-3200</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1293</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0021876</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21219073</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JFPSEV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Anxiety ; Anxiety - psychology ; Anxiety disorders ; Attachment ; Attachment Behavior ; Biological and medical sciences ; Couple and family ; Couples ; Courtship - psychology ; Dating ; Experiences (Events) ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Insecurity ; Internet ; Interpersonal Communication ; Interpersonal Interaction ; Interpersonal Relations ; Male ; Object Attachment ; Perceptions ; Personal relationships ; Positive life events ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Relationship Quality ; Responsiveness ; Romantic relationships ; Social interaction ; Social Perception ; Social psychology ; Students ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Truth Disclosure ; Universities ; Videotape Recording</subject><ispartof>Journal of family psychology, 2011-02, Vol.25 (1), p.77-85</ispartof><rights>2011 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved.</rights><rights>2011, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Feb 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-fbd79eb70aa6d3813a06ed81c4078e09388724508dccb1024a9bf9cfbb6285073</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,31000,33775</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23919193$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21219073$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kaslow, Nadine J</contributor><creatorcontrib>Shallcross, Sandra L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howland, Maryhope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bemis, Jenna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Jeffry A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frazier, Patricia</creatorcontrib><title>Not "Capitalizing" on Social Capitalization Interactions: The Role of Attachment Insecurity</title><title>Journal of family psychology</title><addtitle>J Fam Psychol</addtitle><description>Capitalization interactions, in which partners share positive events, typically produce positive relationship outcomes (Gable, Gonzaga, & Strachman, 2006). However, the limiting conditions of these interactions have not been examined. In this study, 101 dating couples discussed a positive event in the life of each partner. Ratings of perceived responsiveness were made by both the romantic partner who disclosed a positive event and his/her responding partner. Trained observers then rated each videotaped interaction. More avoidantly attached responders reported being and were rated by coders as less responsive, particularly if their disclosing partners were more anxiously attached. Avoidantly attached individuals also underestimated their partners' responsiveness relative to observer ratings. Anxious responders underestimated their own responsiveness when their disclosing partners were more avoidantly attached. These results indicate that insecurely attached individuals are relatively less likely to be responsive and to perceive responsiveness in capitalization interactions than are more securely attached individuals. This is especially true when highly anxious and highly avoidant individuals are relationship partners.</description><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Anxiety - psychology</subject><subject>Anxiety disorders</subject><subject>Attachment</subject><subject>Attachment Behavior</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Couple and family</subject><subject>Couples</subject><subject>Courtship - psychology</subject><subject>Dating</subject><subject>Experiences (Events)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insecurity</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Interpersonal Communication</subject><subject>Interpersonal Interaction</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Object Attachment</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Personal relationships</subject><subject>Positive life events</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Relationship Quality</subject><subject>Responsiveness</subject><subject>Romantic relationships</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social Perception</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Truth Disclosure</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Videotape Recording</subject><issn>0893-3200</issn><issn>1939-1293</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0U1rFDEYB_Agil2r4CeQYUEUYTRvkxdvZam1UCpoPXkIz2QyNmVmMiaZw_rpm6XbVjyUkkNC-PH8E_4IvSb4I8FMfgKMKVFSPEEropmuCdXsKVphpVnNKMYH6EVKVxgTzpR6jg4ooURjyVbo13nI1XoDs88w-L9--r2uwlT9CNbDUN3dQ_bl9nTKLoLdndPn6uLSVd_D4KrQV0c5g70c3ZQLSs4u0eftS_SshyG5V_v9EP38cnyx-VqffTs53Ryd1cCFzHXfdlK7VmIA0TFFGGDhOkUsx1I5rMuTJeUNVp21LcGUg257bfu2FVQ15ReH6N3N3DmGP4tL2Yw-WTcMMLmwJKMa3gghmCjy_YOyTGdYC8b04yhtVLPLX_9Hr8ISp_LlEq05l4TzBxFvmCZS_RNqY0gput7M0Y8QtyXO7Jo2t00X-mY_b2lH193B22oLeLsHkCwMfYTJ-nTvSmRZO_fhxsEMZk5bCzF7O7hUSoylUNPDaGhjiJGSXQPiQbvb</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>Shallcross, Sandra L</creator><creator>Howland, Maryhope</creator><creator>Bemis, Jenna</creator><creator>Simpson, Jeffry A</creator><creator>Frazier, Patricia</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>Not "Capitalizing" on Social Capitalization Interactions: The Role of Attachment Insecurity</title><author>Shallcross, Sandra L ; Howland, Maryhope ; Bemis, Jenna ; Simpson, Jeffry A ; Frazier, Patricia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-fbd79eb70aa6d3813a06ed81c4078e09388724508dccb1024a9bf9cfbb6285073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Anxiety - psychology</topic><topic>Anxiety disorders</topic><topic>Attachment</topic><topic>Attachment Behavior</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Couple and family</topic><topic>Couples</topic><topic>Courtship - psychology</topic><topic>Dating</topic><topic>Experiences (Events)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insecurity</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Interpersonal Communication</topic><topic>Interpersonal Interaction</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Object Attachment</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Personal relationships</topic><topic>Positive life events</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Relationship Quality</topic><topic>Responsiveness</topic><topic>Romantic relationships</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social Perception</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Truth Disclosure</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Videotape Recording</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shallcross, Sandra L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howland, Maryhope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bemis, Jenna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Jeffry A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frazier, Patricia</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of family psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shallcross, Sandra L</au><au>Howland, Maryhope</au><au>Bemis, Jenna</au><au>Simpson, Jeffry A</au><au>Frazier, Patricia</au><au>Kaslow, Nadine J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Not "Capitalizing" on Social Capitalization Interactions: The Role of Attachment Insecurity</atitle><jtitle>Journal of family psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Fam Psychol</addtitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>77</spage><epage>85</epage><pages>77-85</pages><issn>0893-3200</issn><eissn>1939-1293</eissn><coden>JFPSEV</coden><abstract>Capitalization interactions, in which partners share positive events, typically produce positive relationship outcomes (Gable, Gonzaga, & Strachman, 2006). However, the limiting conditions of these interactions have not been examined. In this study, 101 dating couples discussed a positive event in the life of each partner. Ratings of perceived responsiveness were made by both the romantic partner who disclosed a positive event and his/her responding partner. Trained observers then rated each videotaped interaction. More avoidantly attached responders reported being and were rated by coders as less responsive, particularly if their disclosing partners were more anxiously attached. Avoidantly attached individuals also underestimated their partners' responsiveness relative to observer ratings. Anxious responders underestimated their own responsiveness when their disclosing partners were more avoidantly attached. These results indicate that insecurely attached individuals are relatively less likely to be responsive and to perceive responsiveness in capitalization interactions than are more securely attached individuals. This is especially true when highly anxious and highly avoidant individuals are relationship partners.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>21219073</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0021876</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0893-3200 |
ispartof | Journal of family psychology, 2011-02, Vol.25 (1), p.77-85 |
issn | 0893-3200 1939-1293 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_854566636 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Anxiety Anxiety - psychology Anxiety disorders Attachment Attachment Behavior Biological and medical sciences Couple and family Couples Courtship - psychology Dating Experiences (Events) Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Insecurity Internet Interpersonal Communication Interpersonal Interaction Interpersonal Relations Male Object Attachment Perceptions Personal relationships Positive life events Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Relationship Quality Responsiveness Romantic relationships Social interaction Social Perception Social psychology Students Studies Surveys and Questionnaires Truth Disclosure Universities Videotape Recording |
title | Not "Capitalizing" on Social Capitalization Interactions: The Role of Attachment Insecurity |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T01%3A25%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Not%20%22Capitalizing%22%20on%20Social%20Capitalization%20Interactions:%20The%20Role%20of%20Attachment%20Insecurity&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20family%20psychology&rft.au=Shallcross,%20Sandra%20L&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=77&rft.epage=85&rft.pages=77-85&rft.issn=0893-3200&rft.eissn=1939-1293&rft.coden=JFPSEV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0021876&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1023096339%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-fbd79eb70aa6d3813a06ed81c4078e09388724508dccb1024a9bf9cfbb6285073%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=845391789&rft_id=info:pmid/21219073&rfr_iscdi=true |