Loading…

Not "Capitalizing" on Social Capitalization Interactions: The Role of Attachment Insecurity

Capitalization interactions, in which partners share positive events, typically produce positive relationship outcomes (Gable, Gonzaga, & Strachman, 2006). However, the limiting conditions of these interactions have not been examined. In this study, 101 dating couples discussed a positive event...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of family psychology 2011-02, Vol.25 (1), p.77-85
Main Authors: Shallcross, Sandra L, Howland, Maryhope, Bemis, Jenna, Simpson, Jeffry A, Frazier, Patricia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-fbd79eb70aa6d3813a06ed81c4078e09388724508dccb1024a9bf9cfbb6285073
cites
container_end_page 85
container_issue 1
container_start_page 77
container_title Journal of family psychology
container_volume 25
creator Shallcross, Sandra L
Howland, Maryhope
Bemis, Jenna
Simpson, Jeffry A
Frazier, Patricia
description Capitalization interactions, in which partners share positive events, typically produce positive relationship outcomes (Gable, Gonzaga, & Strachman, 2006). However, the limiting conditions of these interactions have not been examined. In this study, 101 dating couples discussed a positive event in the life of each partner. Ratings of perceived responsiveness were made by both the romantic partner who disclosed a positive event and his/her responding partner. Trained observers then rated each videotaped interaction. More avoidantly attached responders reported being and were rated by coders as less responsive, particularly if their disclosing partners were more anxiously attached. Avoidantly attached individuals also underestimated their partners' responsiveness relative to observer ratings. Anxious responders underestimated their own responsiveness when their disclosing partners were more avoidantly attached. These results indicate that insecurely attached individuals are relatively less likely to be responsive and to perceive responsiveness in capitalization interactions than are more securely attached individuals. This is especially true when highly anxious and highly avoidant individuals are relationship partners.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/a0021876
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_854566636</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1023096339</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-fbd79eb70aa6d3813a06ed81c4078e09388724508dccb1024a9bf9cfbb6285073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0U1rFDEYB_Agil2r4CeQYUEUYTRvkxdvZam1UCpoPXkIz2QyNmVmMiaZw_rpm6XbVjyUkkNC-PH8E_4IvSb4I8FMfgKMKVFSPEEropmuCdXsKVphpVnNKMYH6EVKVxgTzpR6jg4ooURjyVbo13nI1XoDs88w-L9--r2uwlT9CNbDUN3dQ_bl9nTKLoLdndPn6uLSVd_D4KrQV0c5g70c3ZQLSs4u0eftS_SshyG5V_v9EP38cnyx-VqffTs53Ryd1cCFzHXfdlK7VmIA0TFFGGDhOkUsx1I5rMuTJeUNVp21LcGUg257bfu2FVQ15ReH6N3N3DmGP4tL2Yw-WTcMMLmwJKMa3gghmCjy_YOyTGdYC8b04yhtVLPLX_9Hr8ISp_LlEq05l4TzBxFvmCZS_RNqY0gput7M0Y8QtyXO7Jo2t00X-mY_b2lH193B22oLeLsHkCwMfYTJ-nTvSmRZO_fhxsEMZk5bCzF7O7hUSoylUNPDaGhjiJGSXQPiQbvb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>845391789</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Not "Capitalizing" on Social Capitalization Interactions: The Role of Attachment Insecurity</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Shallcross, Sandra L ; Howland, Maryhope ; Bemis, Jenna ; Simpson, Jeffry A ; Frazier, Patricia</creator><contributor>Kaslow, Nadine J</contributor><creatorcontrib>Shallcross, Sandra L ; Howland, Maryhope ; Bemis, Jenna ; Simpson, Jeffry A ; Frazier, Patricia ; Kaslow, Nadine J</creatorcontrib><description>Capitalization interactions, in which partners share positive events, typically produce positive relationship outcomes (Gable, Gonzaga, &amp; Strachman, 2006). However, the limiting conditions of these interactions have not been examined. In this study, 101 dating couples discussed a positive event in the life of each partner. Ratings of perceived responsiveness were made by both the romantic partner who disclosed a positive event and his/her responding partner. Trained observers then rated each videotaped interaction. More avoidantly attached responders reported being and were rated by coders as less responsive, particularly if their disclosing partners were more anxiously attached. Avoidantly attached individuals also underestimated their partners' responsiveness relative to observer ratings. Anxious responders underestimated their own responsiveness when their disclosing partners were more avoidantly attached. These results indicate that insecurely attached individuals are relatively less likely to be responsive and to perceive responsiveness in capitalization interactions than are more securely attached individuals. This is especially true when highly anxious and highly avoidant individuals are relationship partners.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0893-3200</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1293</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0021876</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21219073</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JFPSEV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Anxiety ; Anxiety - psychology ; Anxiety disorders ; Attachment ; Attachment Behavior ; Biological and medical sciences ; Couple and family ; Couples ; Courtship - psychology ; Dating ; Experiences (Events) ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Insecurity ; Internet ; Interpersonal Communication ; Interpersonal Interaction ; Interpersonal Relations ; Male ; Object Attachment ; Perceptions ; Personal relationships ; Positive life events ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Relationship Quality ; Responsiveness ; Romantic relationships ; Social interaction ; Social Perception ; Social psychology ; Students ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Truth Disclosure ; Universities ; Videotape Recording</subject><ispartof>Journal of family psychology, 2011-02, Vol.25 (1), p.77-85</ispartof><rights>2011 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved.</rights><rights>2011, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Feb 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-fbd79eb70aa6d3813a06ed81c4078e09388724508dccb1024a9bf9cfbb6285073</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999,31000,33775</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=23919193$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21219073$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kaslow, Nadine J</contributor><creatorcontrib>Shallcross, Sandra L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howland, Maryhope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bemis, Jenna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Jeffry A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frazier, Patricia</creatorcontrib><title>Not "Capitalizing" on Social Capitalization Interactions: The Role of Attachment Insecurity</title><title>Journal of family psychology</title><addtitle>J Fam Psychol</addtitle><description>Capitalization interactions, in which partners share positive events, typically produce positive relationship outcomes (Gable, Gonzaga, &amp; Strachman, 2006). However, the limiting conditions of these interactions have not been examined. In this study, 101 dating couples discussed a positive event in the life of each partner. Ratings of perceived responsiveness were made by both the romantic partner who disclosed a positive event and his/her responding partner. Trained observers then rated each videotaped interaction. More avoidantly attached responders reported being and were rated by coders as less responsive, particularly if their disclosing partners were more anxiously attached. Avoidantly attached individuals also underestimated their partners' responsiveness relative to observer ratings. Anxious responders underestimated their own responsiveness when their disclosing partners were more avoidantly attached. These results indicate that insecurely attached individuals are relatively less likely to be responsive and to perceive responsiveness in capitalization interactions than are more securely attached individuals. This is especially true when highly anxious and highly avoidant individuals are relationship partners.</description><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Anxiety - psychology</subject><subject>Anxiety disorders</subject><subject>Attachment</subject><subject>Attachment Behavior</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Couple and family</subject><subject>Couples</subject><subject>Courtship - psychology</subject><subject>Dating</subject><subject>Experiences (Events)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Insecurity</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Interpersonal Communication</subject><subject>Interpersonal Interaction</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Object Attachment</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Personal relationships</subject><subject>Positive life events</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Relationship Quality</subject><subject>Responsiveness</subject><subject>Romantic relationships</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>Social Perception</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Truth Disclosure</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Videotape Recording</subject><issn>0893-3200</issn><issn>1939-1293</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0U1rFDEYB_Agil2r4CeQYUEUYTRvkxdvZam1UCpoPXkIz2QyNmVmMiaZw_rpm6XbVjyUkkNC-PH8E_4IvSb4I8FMfgKMKVFSPEEropmuCdXsKVphpVnNKMYH6EVKVxgTzpR6jg4ooURjyVbo13nI1XoDs88w-L9--r2uwlT9CNbDUN3dQ_bl9nTKLoLdndPn6uLSVd_D4KrQV0c5g70c3ZQLSs4u0eftS_SshyG5V_v9EP38cnyx-VqffTs53Ryd1cCFzHXfdlK7VmIA0TFFGGDhOkUsx1I5rMuTJeUNVp21LcGUg257bfu2FVQ15ReH6N3N3DmGP4tL2Yw-WTcMMLmwJKMa3gghmCjy_YOyTGdYC8b04yhtVLPLX_9Hr8ISp_LlEq05l4TzBxFvmCZS_RNqY0gput7M0Y8QtyXO7Jo2t00X-mY_b2lH193B22oLeLsHkCwMfYTJ-nTvSmRZO_fhxsEMZk5bCzF7O7hUSoylUNPDaGhjiJGSXQPiQbvb</recordid><startdate>20110201</startdate><enddate>20110201</enddate><creator>Shallcross, Sandra L</creator><creator>Howland, Maryhope</creator><creator>Bemis, Jenna</creator><creator>Simpson, Jeffry A</creator><creator>Frazier, Patricia</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110201</creationdate><title>Not "Capitalizing" on Social Capitalization Interactions: The Role of Attachment Insecurity</title><author>Shallcross, Sandra L ; Howland, Maryhope ; Bemis, Jenna ; Simpson, Jeffry A ; Frazier, Patricia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-fbd79eb70aa6d3813a06ed81c4078e09388724508dccb1024a9bf9cfbb6285073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Anxiety - psychology</topic><topic>Anxiety disorders</topic><topic>Attachment</topic><topic>Attachment Behavior</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Couple and family</topic><topic>Couples</topic><topic>Courtship - psychology</topic><topic>Dating</topic><topic>Experiences (Events)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Insecurity</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Interpersonal Communication</topic><topic>Interpersonal Interaction</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Object Attachment</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Personal relationships</topic><topic>Positive life events</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Relationship Quality</topic><topic>Responsiveness</topic><topic>Romantic relationships</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>Social Perception</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Truth Disclosure</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Videotape Recording</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shallcross, Sandra L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howland, Maryhope</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bemis, Jenna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Jeffry A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frazier, Patricia</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of family psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shallcross, Sandra L</au><au>Howland, Maryhope</au><au>Bemis, Jenna</au><au>Simpson, Jeffry A</au><au>Frazier, Patricia</au><au>Kaslow, Nadine J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Not "Capitalizing" on Social Capitalization Interactions: The Role of Attachment Insecurity</atitle><jtitle>Journal of family psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Fam Psychol</addtitle><date>2011-02-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>77</spage><epage>85</epage><pages>77-85</pages><issn>0893-3200</issn><eissn>1939-1293</eissn><coden>JFPSEV</coden><abstract>Capitalization interactions, in which partners share positive events, typically produce positive relationship outcomes (Gable, Gonzaga, &amp; Strachman, 2006). However, the limiting conditions of these interactions have not been examined. In this study, 101 dating couples discussed a positive event in the life of each partner. Ratings of perceived responsiveness were made by both the romantic partner who disclosed a positive event and his/her responding partner. Trained observers then rated each videotaped interaction. More avoidantly attached responders reported being and were rated by coders as less responsive, particularly if their disclosing partners were more anxiously attached. Avoidantly attached individuals also underestimated their partners' responsiveness relative to observer ratings. Anxious responders underestimated their own responsiveness when their disclosing partners were more avoidantly attached. These results indicate that insecurely attached individuals are relatively less likely to be responsive and to perceive responsiveness in capitalization interactions than are more securely attached individuals. This is especially true when highly anxious and highly avoidant individuals are relationship partners.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>21219073</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0021876</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0893-3200
ispartof Journal of family psychology, 2011-02, Vol.25 (1), p.77-85
issn 0893-3200
1939-1293
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_854566636
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Anxiety
Anxiety - psychology
Anxiety disorders
Attachment
Attachment Behavior
Biological and medical sciences
Couple and family
Couples
Courtship - psychology
Dating
Experiences (Events)
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Human
Humans
Insecurity
Internet
Interpersonal Communication
Interpersonal Interaction
Interpersonal Relations
Male
Object Attachment
Perceptions
Personal relationships
Positive life events
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Relationship Quality
Responsiveness
Romantic relationships
Social interaction
Social Perception
Social psychology
Students
Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
Truth Disclosure
Universities
Videotape Recording
title Not "Capitalizing" on Social Capitalization Interactions: The Role of Attachment Insecurity
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T01%3A25%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Not%20%22Capitalizing%22%20on%20Social%20Capitalization%20Interactions:%20The%20Role%20of%20Attachment%20Insecurity&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20family%20psychology&rft.au=Shallcross,%20Sandra%20L&rft.date=2011-02-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=77&rft.epage=85&rft.pages=77-85&rft.issn=0893-3200&rft.eissn=1939-1293&rft.coden=JFPSEV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0021876&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1023096339%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-fbd79eb70aa6d3813a06ed81c4078e09388724508dccb1024a9bf9cfbb6285073%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=845391789&rft_id=info:pmid/21219073&rfr_iscdi=true