Loading…

Language Attitudes and Social Influence

According to the theory of language attitudes, Ss may show either a paradigmatic attitude towards language (PA) or a syntagmatic attitude (SA). In PA attitude, language is concerned as a self-regulated and self-referring code; in SA attitude language is concerned as a communication tool. Subjects ev...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of social psychology 1983-10, Vol.121 (1), p.97-109
Main Authors: Ghiglione, R., Beauvois, J. L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:According to the theory of language attitudes, Ss may show either a paradigmatic attitude towards language (PA) or a syntagmatic attitude (SA). In PA attitude, language is concerned as a self-regulated and self-referring code; in SA attitude language is concerned as a communication tool. Subjects evaluated as PA Ss produced messages in which the metalinguistic function was more important than the interlocutory function, whereas Ss evaluated as SA Ss produced messages in which the interlocutory function was more important than the metalinguistic function. The four studies presented here deal with the attitude change paradigm and concentrate upon the interaction between (a) the discursive texture of persuasive messages (which are either metalinguistic or interlocutory) and (b) the language attitude, PA or SA, shown by Ss. Significant results are obtained as regards source evaluation, message retention, and attitude change. In each case, a message that was predominantly metalinguistic in character was more effective with Ss evaluated as PA Ss, whereas a predominantly interlocutory message was more effective with those evaluated as SA Ss.
ISSN:0022-4545
1940-1183
DOI:10.1080/00224545.1983.9924471