Language constructing language: the implications of reflexivity for linguistic theory

The reflexive (meta-linguistic) properties of language are typically represented as supplemental and inessential. Language, so the story goes, could get along perfectly well without them. The characteristics of language are independent of reflexive discourse — independent of how in metadiscourse we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Language sciences (Oxford) 2000-10, Vol.22 (4), p.483-499
Main Author: Taylor, Talbot J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Descriptive studies and applied theories
Language development
Languages
Linguistic reflexivity
Linguistics
Metalanguage
Metalinguistics
Metapragmatics
Phonology
Pragmatics
Second Language Learning
Semantics
Translation
Writing
Written Language
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The reflexive (meta-linguistic) properties of language are typically represented as supplemental and inessential. Language, so the story goes, could get along perfectly well without them. The characteristics of language are independent of reflexive discourse — independent of how in metadiscourse we talk about language and its characteristics. This paper challenges this web of received opinion by asking: What might ‘first-order’ language be like if there were no way to talk, write, or sign about it — that is, if there were no ‘second order’ metalanguage? By considering the consequences for writing, translation, pragmatics, semantics, and language acquisition and evolution, the conclusion arrived at is that without ‘second-order’, reflexive properties, ‘first order’ language itself could not exist.
ISSN:0388-0001
1873-5746
DOI:10.1016/S0388-0001(00)00016-4