Testing Assumptions in Computational Theories of Aphasia

We present the performances of 13 aphasic patients on a picture-naming task and attempt to model these data using computer simulations. We systematically manipulate the assumptions underlying several interactive, two-step, spreading-activation models, including the proposals of Dell et al. (1997), F...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of memory and language 2000-08, Vol.43 (2), p.217-248
Main Authors: Ruml, Wheeler, Caramazza, Alfonso, Shelton, Jennifer R, Chialant, Doriana
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult and adolescent clinical studies
aphasia
Biological and medical sciences
Brain damage
computational modeling
computational neuropsychology
Language and communication disorders
lexical access
Mathematical models
Medical sciences
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Simulation
Theory
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We present the performances of 13 aphasic patients on a picture-naming task and attempt to model these data using computer simulations. We systematically manipulate the assumptions underlying several interactive, two-step, spreading-activation models, including the proposals of Dell et al. (1997), Foygel and Dell (2000), and Rapp and Goldrick (in press). Using a numerical regres-sion procedure and multiple views of each model's possible output, we find that peripheral pragmatic assumptionsplay a role equal to that of theoretically more central model components. None of the models we consider can account for all of the patients, leading us to conclude that one or more of the assumptions underlying each model is flawed. We argue that there are strong limitations on the conclusions that can legitimately be drawn from such simulation studies but that close analysis of individual patients can allow sound testing of potentially more accurate models.
ISSN:0749-596X
1096-0821
DOI:10.1006/jmla.2000.2730