Plans, Affordances, and Combinatory Grammar

The idea that natural language grammar and planned action are related systems has been implicit in psychological theory for more than a century. However, formal theories in the two domains have tended to look very different. This article argues that both faculties share the formal character of appli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Linguistics and philosophy 2002-12, Vol.25 (5/6), p.723-753
Main Author: Steedman, Mark
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Artificial intelligence
Children
Grammar
Knowledge
Language
Linguistic theory
Linguistics
Mathematical functions
Music composition
Musical grammar
Musical notation
Natural language
Ontology
Philosophy
Philosophy of language. Logic
Semantics
Sensory perception
Tense
Verbs
Word order
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-a4a0c69e8e4cf53189a2b011e3caffeb67e6fd28a2209c62f62684baf18aa2593
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-a4a0c69e8e4cf53189a2b011e3caffeb67e6fd28a2209c62f62684baf18aa2593
container_end_page 753
container_issue 5/6
container_start_page 723
container_title Linguistics and philosophy
container_volume 25
creator Steedman, Mark
description The idea that natural language grammar and planned action are related systems has been implicit in psychological theory for more than a century. However, formal theories in the two domains have tended to look very different. This article argues that both faculties share the formal character of applicative systems based on operations corresponding to the same two combinatory operations, namely functional composition and type-raising. Viewing them in this way suggests simpler and more cognitively plausible accounts of both systems, and suggests that the language faculty evolved in the species and develops in children by a rather direct adaptation of a more primitive apparatus for planning purposive action in the world by composing affordances of objects or tools. The knowledge representation that underlies such planning is also reflected in the natural language semantics of tense, mood, and aspect, which the paper begins by arguing provides the key to understanding both systems.
doi_str_mv 10.1023/a:1020820000972
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85569647</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>25001872</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>25001872</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-a4a0c69e8e4cf53189a2b011e3caffeb67e6fd28a2209c62f62684baf18aa2593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKtnT0IR9KJrJ8kmm3grRatQ0IOel9k0gS37UZP20H_vSIuiF-cww2Seecm8jJ1zuOMg5BjvqYARQGELccAGXBUyA5XbQzYArlUG9HLMTlJaEiMKawfs5rXBLt2OJiH0cYGd89RgtxhN-7aqO1z3cTuaRWxbjKfsKGCT_Nm-Dtn748Pb9Cmbv8yep5N5hjmoNWUEp603PndBSW4sigo499JhCL7ShddhIQwKAdZpEbTQJq8wcIMolJVDdr3TXcX-Y-PTumzr5HxDP_X9JpVGKW11XvwLSpNTgCbw8g-47DexoyNKY2QBxghJ0HgHudinFH0oV7Gms7clh_LL4nJS_rKYNq72spgcNiGSf3X6WculVrowxF3suGUiP7_nQgFwQzqfh2mCEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>883708823</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Plans, Affordances, and Combinatory Grammar</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>Linguistics Collection</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Steedman, Mark</creator><creatorcontrib>Steedman, Mark</creatorcontrib><description>The idea that natural language grammar and planned action are related systems has been implicit in psychological theory for more than a century. However, formal theories in the two domains have tended to look very different. This article argues that both faculties share the formal character of applicative systems based on operations corresponding to the same two combinatory operations, namely functional composition and type-raising. Viewing them in this way suggests simpler and more cognitively plausible accounts of both systems, and suggests that the language faculty evolved in the species and develops in children by a rather direct adaptation of a more primitive apparatus for planning purposive action in the world by composing affordances of objects or tools. The knowledge representation that underlies such planning is also reflected in the natural language semantics of tense, mood, and aspect, which the paper begins by arguing provides the key to understanding both systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0157</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0549</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/a:1020820000972</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LIPHD6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Kluwer Academic Publishers</publisher><subject>Artificial intelligence ; Children ; Grammar ; Knowledge ; Language ; Linguistic theory ; Linguistics ; Mathematical functions ; Music composition ; Musical grammar ; Musical notation ; Natural language ; Ontology ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of language. Logic ; Semantics ; Sensory perception ; Tense ; Verbs ; Word order</subject><ispartof>Linguistics and philosophy, 2002-12, Vol.25 (5/6), p.723-753</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-a4a0c69e8e4cf53189a2b011e3caffeb67e6fd28a2209c62f62684baf18aa2593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-a4a0c69e8e4cf53189a2b011e3caffeb67e6fd28a2209c62f62684baf18aa2593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/883708823/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/883708823?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,12834,12838,21369,21381,27911,27912,31256,31257,33210,33211,33598,33599,33898,33899,43720,43883,58225,58458,62646,62647,62649,62662,73951,73976,74168</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14365678$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Steedman, Mark</creatorcontrib><title>Plans, Affordances, and Combinatory Grammar</title><title>Linguistics and philosophy</title><description>The idea that natural language grammar and planned action are related systems has been implicit in psychological theory for more than a century. However, formal theories in the two domains have tended to look very different. This article argues that both faculties share the formal character of applicative systems based on operations corresponding to the same two combinatory operations, namely functional composition and type-raising. Viewing them in this way suggests simpler and more cognitively plausible accounts of both systems, and suggests that the language faculty evolved in the species and develops in children by a rather direct adaptation of a more primitive apparatus for planning purposive action in the world by composing affordances of objects or tools. The knowledge representation that underlies such planning is also reflected in the natural language semantics of tense, mood, and aspect, which the paper begins by arguing provides the key to understanding both systems.</description><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Linguistic theory</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Mathematical functions</subject><subject>Music composition</subject><subject>Musical grammar</subject><subject>Musical notation</subject><subject>Natural language</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of language. Logic</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><subject>Tense</subject><subject>Verbs</subject><subject>Word order</subject><issn>0165-0157</issn><issn>1573-0549</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CPGLG</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKtnT0IR9KJrJ8kmm3grRatQ0IOel9k0gS37UZP20H_vSIuiF-cww2Seecm8jJ1zuOMg5BjvqYARQGELccAGXBUyA5XbQzYArlUG9HLMTlJaEiMKawfs5rXBLt2OJiH0cYGd89RgtxhN-7aqO1z3cTuaRWxbjKfsKGCT_Nm-Dtn748Pb9Cmbv8yep5N5hjmoNWUEp603PndBSW4sigo499JhCL7ShddhIQwKAdZpEbTQJq8wcIMolJVDdr3TXcX-Y-PTumzr5HxDP_X9JpVGKW11XvwLSpNTgCbw8g-47DexoyNKY2QBxghJ0HgHudinFH0oV7Gms7clh_LL4nJS_rKYNq72spgcNiGSf3X6WculVrowxF3suGUiP7_nQgFwQzqfh2mCEw</recordid><startdate>20021201</startdate><enddate>20021201</enddate><creator>Steedman, Mark</creator><general>Kluwer Academic Publishers</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021201</creationdate><title>Plans, Affordances, and Combinatory Grammar</title><author>Steedman, Mark</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-a4a0c69e8e4cf53189a2b011e3caffeb67e6fd28a2209c62f62684baf18aa2593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Linguistic theory</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Mathematical functions</topic><topic>Music composition</topic><topic>Musical grammar</topic><topic>Musical notation</topic><topic>Natural language</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of language. Logic</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><topic>Tense</topic><topic>Verbs</topic><topic>Word order</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Steedman, Mark</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Linguistics and philosophy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Steedman, Mark</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Plans, Affordances, and Combinatory Grammar</atitle><jtitle>Linguistics and philosophy</jtitle><date>2002-12-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>5/6</issue><spage>723</spage><epage>753</epage><pages>723-753</pages><issn>0165-0157</issn><eissn>1573-0549</eissn><coden>LIPHD6</coden><abstract>The idea that natural language grammar and planned action are related systems has been implicit in psychological theory for more than a century. However, formal theories in the two domains have tended to look very different. This article argues that both faculties share the formal character of applicative systems based on operations corresponding to the same two combinatory operations, namely functional composition and type-raising. Viewing them in this way suggests simpler and more cognitively plausible accounts of both systems, and suggests that the language faculty evolved in the species and develops in children by a rather direct adaptation of a more primitive apparatus for planning purposive action in the world by composing affordances of objects or tools. The knowledge representation that underlies such planning is also reflected in the natural language semantics of tense, mood, and aspect, which the paper begins by arguing provides the key to understanding both systems.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Kluwer Academic Publishers</pub><doi>10.1023/a:1020820000972</doi><tpages>31</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-0157
ispartof Linguistics and philosophy, 2002-12, Vol.25 (5/6), p.723-753
issn 0165-0157
1573-0549
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_85569647
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; Springer Nature; Linguistics Collection; ProQuest One Literature; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)
subjects Artificial intelligence
Children
Grammar
Knowledge
Language
Linguistic theory
Linguistics
Mathematical functions
Music composition
Musical grammar
Musical notation
Natural language
Ontology
Philosophy
Philosophy of language. Logic
Semantics
Sensory perception
Tense
Verbs
Word order
title Plans, Affordances, and Combinatory Grammar
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T13%3A18%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Plans,%20Affordances,%20and%20Combinatory%20Grammar&rft.jtitle=Linguistics%20and%20philosophy&rft.au=Steedman,%20Mark&rft.date=2002-12-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=5/6&rft.spage=723&rft.epage=753&rft.pages=723-753&rft.issn=0165-0157&rft.eissn=1573-0549&rft.coden=LIPHD6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/a:1020820000972&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E25001872%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-a4a0c69e8e4cf53189a2b011e3caffeb67e6fd28a2209c62f62684baf18aa2593%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=883708823&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=25001872&rfr_iscdi=true