Performance analysis of the Richland-Chambers treatment wetlands

The Tarrant Regional Water District (TRWD) is supplementing the flows to Richland-Chambers Reservoir, to meet future water supply needs of Dallas-Ft. Worth, TX. The Trinity River is the new source, but quality is not adequate. TRWD has constructed and investigated treatment wetland facilities locate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological engineering 2011-02, Vol.37 (2), p.176-190
Main Authors: Kadlec, Robert H., Bays, James S., Mokry, Loretta E., Andrews, Darrel, Ernst, Mark R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Basins
Freshwater
Hydrology
Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Pilots
Reservoirs
Rivers
Sediments
Trains
Treatment wetlands
TSS
Wetlands
Wildlife
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The Tarrant Regional Water District (TRWD) is supplementing the flows to Richland-Chambers Reservoir, to meet future water supply needs of Dallas-Ft. Worth, TX. The Trinity River is the new source, but quality is not adequate. TRWD has constructed and investigated treatment wetland facilities located near the reservoir to upgrade river water quality, from an eight-year study at a 0.72ha pilot site, and a five-year study at a 102ha field-scale site. Both systems had a sedimentation basin followed by wetland cells in series. The pilot had two basins feeding three trains of three wetland cells each, while the field-scale system had one basin followed by four wetland cells in series. Water depths were about 30cm for the pilot, and 40cm for the field-scale. Design nominal detention times were roughly 5 and 9 days for pilot basins and wetland trains; and 1.5 and 8 days for the field-scale. The systems ran year-round, supplied with water pumped from the river, which at times was predominantly treated wastewater from the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex. The primary target contaminants were suspended solids, nitrogen, and phosphorus. Nitrogen forms in pumped flows from the river were dominated by oxidized nitrogen, which was mostly nitrate nitrogen. Pilot nitrate removal from the river water was 92%, and 61% for phosphorus, while sediment removal was 97%. Field-scale nitrate removal from the river water was 77%, and 45% for phosphorus, while sediment removal was 96%. The field-scale project is located on land owned by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, and they participate in management of the wetlands for the secondary purpose of wildlife habitat.
ISSN:0925-8574
1872-6992
DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.09.003