Loading…
Origin of far-field potentials in the ulnar compound muscle action potential
Introduction: The compound muscle action potential (CMAP) following ulnar nerve stimulation receives a considerable contribution from far‐field potentials (FFPs), although their origin is not entirely clear. We investigated this issue using voluntary contractions. Methods: In 7 control subjects, we...
Saved in:
Published in: | Muscle & nerve 2011-05, Vol.43 (5), p.671-678 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Introduction:
The compound muscle action potential (CMAP) following ulnar nerve stimulation receives a considerable contribution from far‐field potentials (FFPs), although their origin is not entirely clear. We investigated this issue using voluntary contractions.
Methods:
In 7 control subjects, we placed multiple recording electrodes over the motor points of ulnar‐innervated muscles. We asked the subjects to perform a weak movement corresponding to the action of each muscle, and identified the single motor unit potentials (MUPs) from that muscle. We summed the MUPs from each individual muscle and reconstructed the CMAPs.
Results:
The reconstructed CMAPs coincided well with the actual ones. The N1, P1, and early N2 components of the FFPs were generated primarily by palmar, but also by dorsal, interosseous muscles. The abductor digiti minimi muscle usually generated positive–negative biphasic FFPs, and the negative FFP generated the late N2 component.
Conclusions:
These results should prompt a revision of the theory of FFP generation. Muscle Nerve, 2011 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0148-639X 1097-4598 |
DOI: | 10.1002/mus.21931 |