Loading…

Origin of far-field potentials in the ulnar compound muscle action potential

Introduction: The compound muscle action potential (CMAP) following ulnar nerve stimulation receives a considerable contribution from far‐field potentials (FFPs), although their origin is not entirely clear. We investigated this issue using voluntary contractions. Methods: In 7 control subjects, we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Muscle & nerve 2011-05, Vol.43 (5), p.671-678
Main Authors: Sonoo, Masahiro, Kurokawa, Katsumi, Higashihara, Mana, Kurono, Hiroko, Hokkoku, Keiichi, Hatanaka, Yuki, Shimizu, Teruo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Introduction: The compound muscle action potential (CMAP) following ulnar nerve stimulation receives a considerable contribution from far‐field potentials (FFPs), although their origin is not entirely clear. We investigated this issue using voluntary contractions. Methods: In 7 control subjects, we placed multiple recording electrodes over the motor points of ulnar‐innervated muscles. We asked the subjects to perform a weak movement corresponding to the action of each muscle, and identified the single motor unit potentials (MUPs) from that muscle. We summed the MUPs from each individual muscle and reconstructed the CMAPs. Results: The reconstructed CMAPs coincided well with the actual ones. The N1, P1, and early N2 components of the FFPs were generated primarily by palmar, but also by dorsal, interosseous muscles. The abductor digiti minimi muscle usually generated positive–negative biphasic FFPs, and the negative FFP generated the late N2 component. Conclusions: These results should prompt a revision of the theory of FFP generation. Muscle Nerve, 2011
ISSN:0148-639X
1097-4598
DOI:10.1002/mus.21931