Loading…

Prioritizing problem features in Korean patients with senile dementia for implementation of monitoring technologies

Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate the central problem features of Korean patients with senile dementia and to prioritize the features according to risk to the patient with a view to the implementation of remote monitoring technologies. Twenty central problem features were extract...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychiatry research 2011-05, Vol.187 (3), p.418-423
Main Authors: Tack, Gye-Rae, Choi, Mi-Hyun, Lee, Su-Jeong, Yang, Jae-Woong, Kim, Ji-Hye, Choi, Jin-Seung, Jun, Jae-Hoon, Lee, Jeong-Whan, Park, Jang-Yeon, Moon, Seok-Woo, Chung, Soon-Cheol
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate the central problem features of Korean patients with senile dementia and to prioritize the features according to risk to the patient with a view to the implementation of remote monitoring technologies. Twenty central problem features were extracted using factorial analysis. The frequency of violent language and confabulation, gathering, and repetition was significantly greater in female than in male patients with senile dementia. All central features, with the exception of abnormal sexual behavior and audiovisual deficits, differed in frequency between the normal elderly and the senile dementia patients and between patients with dementias of different severity. Judgment disorder was the greatest differentiating factor between the normal elderly and the patients with senile dementia. For dementia severity, memory disorder was the greatest differentiating factor of severe versus mild dementia. When risk to the patient was analyzed, problems of perception were identified as the problem features of highest priority.
ISSN:0165-1781
1872-7123
DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2010.06.031