Loading…
“Gratuities” for donated organs: ethically indefensible
[...] if a ban cannot be made to work, why should we expect regulation to be implemented successfully? [...] there is no justification for retreating from the World Health Assembly's recent affirmation that "voluntary, non-remunerated donation of organs... helps to ensure a vital community...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Lancet (British edition) 2011-04, Vol.377 (9775), p.1390-1391 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | [...] if a ban cannot be made to work, why should we expect regulation to be implemented successfully? [...] there is no justification for retreating from the World Health Assembly's recent affirmation that "voluntary, non-remunerated donation of organs... helps to ensure a vital community resource",2 one that depends on countries developing robust systems for deceased donation, and enacting and enforcing organvending prohibitions that encompass gratuities, which are simply "disguised forms of payment" as stated by the commentary to WHO's Guiding Principle 5 (panel).2 How ironic but also sad that proponents of organ markets should choose Manila-where thousands of people who are poor bear the scar of having sold a kidney-as the locale for their attempt to undermine the global consensus on how to promote ethical organ transplantation and to put an end to the human-rights violations that inhere in trafficking in human organs and in the vulnerable people from whom they are extracted.16 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0140-6736 1474-547X |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61419-5 |