Loading…

Noradrenaline Protects In Vivo Rat Heart Against Infarction and Ventricular Arrhythmias Via Nitric Oxide and Reactive Oxygen Species

Background Our previous study showed that pretreatment with noradrenaline via opening of the mitochondrial ATP-sensitive potassium channel protects myocardium against ischemia/reperfusion injuries. We have hypothesized that production of nitric oxide (NO) and generation of reactive oxygen species (R...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of surgical research 2011-07, Vol.169 (1), p.9-15
Main Authors: Imani, Alireza, Ph.D, Faghihi, Mahdieh, Ph.D, Sadr, Sayyed Shahabeddin, Ph.D, Niaraki, Somayeh Sadeghi, BS.c, Alizadeh, Ali Mohammad, Ph.D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Our previous study showed that pretreatment with noradrenaline via opening of the mitochondrial ATP-sensitive potassium channel protects myocardium against ischemia/reperfusion injuries. We have hypothesized that production of nitric oxide (NO) and generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) are involved in noradrenaline-induced cardioprotection in rat heart. Methods All anesthetized rats underwent 25min of regional ischemia followed by 120min of reperfusion. Animals were randomized to receive one of the following treatment: saline, noradrenaline (2 μg/kg, i.v.), noradrenaline plus prazosin (an α1 -adrenoceptor blocker, 0.5mg/kg, i.v.), noradrenaline plus L-NAME (a nonspecific NOS inhibitor, 10mg/kg, i.v.), noradrenaline plus tempol (a membrane-permeable radical scavenger, 30mg/kg, i.v.), Prazosin alone, only L-NAME and tempol alone. Results Infarct size (% of risk area) was reduced from 49.6 ± 2.4 in saline-control group to 18.2 ± 1.5 in noradrenaline preconditioned group. Administration of prazosin, L-NAME, or tempol prior to noradrenaline injection abolished the observed cardioprotection of noradrenaline (45.5 ± 3, 41.7 ± 4.5 and 38.7 ± 5.4, respectively) and restored infarct size to saline-control rats' level. Incidences and severity of ventricular arrhythmia during ischemia and early reperfusion significantly decreased in noradrenaline preconditioned group compared with saline-control group. This cardioprotective effect of noradrenaline against ventricular arrhythmia was abrogated by administration of prazosin, L-NAME, or tempol. Conclusion Cardioprotection effect of the α1 -adrenoceptor stimulation by noradrenaline was inhibited by L-NAME or tempol in anesthetized rat heart.
ISSN:0022-4804
1095-8673
DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2009.10.025