Loading…

Location of Food Stores Near Schools Does Not Predict the Weight Status of Maine High School Students

Abstract Objective To examine the relationship between stores selling calorie-dense food near schools and student obesity risk, with the hypothesis that high availability predicts increased risk. Methods Mail surveys determined height, weight, and calorie-dense food consumption for 552 students at 1...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of nutrition education and behavior 2011-07, Vol.43 (4), p.274-278
Main Authors: Harris, David E., PhD, Blum, Janet Whatley, ScD, Bampton, Matthew, PhD, O’Brien, Liam M., PhD, Beaudoin, Christina M., PhD, Polacsek, Michele, PhD, O’Rourke, Karen A., MPH
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Objective To examine the relationship between stores selling calorie-dense food near schools and student obesity risk, with the hypothesis that high availability predicts increased risk. Methods Mail surveys determined height, weight, and calorie-dense food consumption for 552 students at 11 Maine high schools. Driving distance from all food stores within 2 km (1.24 miles) of schools (or the closest store) was computed, and the impact of food store density and proximity to schools on student body mass index was determined by logistic regression. Results Ten schools had ≥ 1 store selling soda, and 8 schools had ≥1 fast-food restaurant within 1 km (0.62 miles). There were no significant relationships between the proximity or density of food stores around schools and student obesity risk. Students obtained sugar-sweetened beverages in many locations including at school. Conclusions and Implications Unhealthful food choices are ubiquitous. Consequently, stores selling these food items near schools have no significant affect on student obesity.
ISSN:1499-4046
1878-2620
1708-8259
DOI:10.1016/j.jneb.2010.08.008