Loading…
Perturbation-evoked cortical activity reflects both the context and consequence of postural instability
Abstract The cerebral cortex may play a role in the control of compensatory balance reactions by optimizing these responses to suit the task conditions and/or to stimulus (i.e. perturbation) characteristics. These possible contributions appear to be reflected by pre-perturbation and post-perturbatio...
Saved in:
Published in: | Neuroscience 2010-10, Vol.170 (2), p.599-609 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Abstract The cerebral cortex may play a role in the control of compensatory balance reactions by optimizing these responses to suit the task conditions and/or to stimulus (i.e. perturbation) characteristics. These possible contributions appear to be reflected by pre-perturbation and post-perturbation cortical activity. While studies have explored the characteristics and possible meaning of these different events (pre- vs. post-) there is little insight into the possible association between them. The purpose of this study was to explore whether pre- and post-perturbation cortical events are associated or whether they reflect different control processes linked to the control of balance. Twelve participants were presented temporally-predictable postural perturbations under four test conditions. The Block/Random tasks were designed to assess modifiability in CNS gain prior to instability, while the Unconstrained/Constrained tasks assessed responsiveness to the magnitude of instability. Perturbations were evoked by releasing a cable which held the participant in a forward lean position. The magnitude of pre-perturbation cortical activity scaled to perturbation amplitude when the magnitude of the perturbation was predictable [ F (3,11)=2.906, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0306-4522 1873-7544 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.07.008 |