Effect of two restorative materials on root dentine erosion

• Published in: Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials Applied biomaterials, 2010-05, Vol.93B (2), p.304-308
• Main Authors: Domiciano, Silvia Jorge, Colucci, Vivian, Campos Serra, Mônica
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acrylic Resins - pharmacology; Adult; Animals; Biological and medical sciences; Cattle; Composite Resins - pharmacology; Cross-Over Studies; Dental Pulp Cavity; Dentin; dentine; Double-Blind Method; erosion; Female; fluoride; Hardness Tests; Head and neck surgery. Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics; Humans; Male; Maxillofacial surgery. Dental surgery. Orthodontics; Medical sciences; Polyurethanes - pharmacology; restorative materials; Silicon Dioxide - pharmacology; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases; Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments; Time Factors; Tooth Erosion - therapy
• ISSN: 1552-4973; 1552-4981; 1552-4981
• DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31532

This study sought to evaluate the microhardness of root dentine adjacent to glass‐ionomer and composite resin restorations after erosive challenge. A crossover study was performed in two phases of 4 consecutive days each. One hundred twelve bovine root dentine slabs were obtained, and standardized box‐shaped cavities were prepared at center of each specimen. The prepared cavities were randomly restored with glass‐ionomer cement or composite resin. The slabs were randomly assigned among 14 volunteers, which wore intraoral palatal device containing four restored root dentin slabs. Starting on the second day, half of the palatal acrylic devices were immersed extraorally in a lemonade‐like carbonated soft drink for 90 s, four times daily for 3 days. After 3‐day wash‐out, dentine slabs restored with the alternative material were placed into palatal appliance and the volunteers started the second phase of this study. After erosive challenges, microhardness measurements were performed. Regardless of the restorative material employed, eroded specimens demonstrated lower microhardness value (p < 0.0001). At eroded condition examined in this study, dentine restored with glass‐ionomer cement showed higher microhardness values (p < 0.0001). It may be concluded that the glass‐ionomer cement decreases the progression of root dentine erosion at restoration margin. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2010