Loading…
Prevalence, strain identification and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. isolated from slaughtered pig carcasses in Brazil
The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of contamination, species identification and antimicrobial resistance of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in pig carcasses during the slaughter process in a slaughterhouse in Brazil. Two hundred and fifty-nine samples were collected at 7 different sta...
Saved in:
Published in: | Food control 2011-05, Vol.22 (5), p.702-707 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of contamination, species identification and antimicrobial resistance of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in pig carcasses during the slaughter process in a slaughterhouse in Brazil. Two hundred and fifty-nine samples were collected at 7 different stages of the slaughter process for Campylobacter determination by both qualitative and quantitative methods. Typical colonies were subjected to API Campy, real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and antimicrobial resistance testing. Campylobacter was found in 18.9% of the carcasses and 3.5% of the samples. Dehairing was the slaughter stage with the highest Campylobacter contamination (55.6%). All Campylobacter strains were confirmed by real-time PCR and showed multi-drug resistance to cephalothin, nalidixic acid, norfloxacin, tetracycline and trimethoprim. None of the strains were resistant to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ampicillin and chloramphenicol. Despite the low occurrence of Campylobacter spp. in pig samples, the antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter strains represents a considerable risk for the consumption of pork meat and confirms the need for continuous monitoring of Campylobacter in the pig production chain. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0956-7135 1873-7129 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.10.005 |