Loading…
Comparison of near infra-red spectroscopy, neutral detergent fibre assay and in-vitro organic matter digestibility assay for rapid determination of the biochemical methane potential of meadow grasses
► NIRS, IVOMD assay and NDF assay have been investigated as rapid biochemical methane potential assessment methods. ► Models have been built to predict the BMPs of meadow grasses using NIRS, IVOMD and NDF. ► Amongst the three methods, NIRS shows the best prediction results and seems to be a promisin...
Saved in:
Published in: | Bioresource technology 2011-09, Vol.102 (17), p.7835-7839 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | ► NIRS, IVOMD assay and NDF assay have been investigated as rapid biochemical methane potential assessment methods. ► Models have been built to predict the BMPs of meadow grasses using NIRS, IVOMD and NDF. ► Amongst the three methods, NIRS shows the best prediction results and seems to be a promising option.
This paper investigates near infra-red spectroscopy (NIRS) as an indirect and rapid method to assess the biochemical methane potential (BMP) of meadow grasses. Additionally analytical methods usually associated with forage analysis, namely, the neutral detergent fibre assay (NDF), and the in-vitro organic matter digestibility assay (IVOMD), were also tested on the meadow grass samples and the applicability of the models in predicting the BMP was studied. Based on these, regression models were obtained using the partial least squares (PLS) method. Various data pre-treatments were also applied to improve the models. Compared to the models based on the NDF and IVOMD predictions of BMP, the model based on the NIRS prediction of BMP gave the best results. This model, with data pre-processed by the mean normalisation method, had an R2 value of 0.69, a root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) of 37.4 and a residual prediction deviation (RPD) of 1.75. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0960-8524 1873-2976 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.05.049 |