Loading…
The effects of an anti–IL-13 mAb on cytokine levels and nasal symptoms following nasal allergen challenge
Background IL-13 is a key TH 2 cytokine that is implicated in allergic responses. Objective We evaluated the effects of an anti–IL-13–blocking antibody compared with placebo on repeated nasal allergen challenge responses in hay fever patients out of season. Methods We performed a parallel group doub...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of allergy and clinical immunology 2011-10, Vol.128 (4), p.800-807.e9 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background IL-13 is a key TH 2 cytokine that is implicated in allergic responses. Objective We evaluated the effects of an anti–IL-13–blocking antibody compared with placebo on repeated nasal allergen challenge responses in hay fever patients out of season. Methods We performed a parallel group double-blind study of anti–IL-13 (single dose, 6 mg/kg intravenously, n = 16) and placebo (n = 15), with an additional open label group given a topical nasal corticosteroid (n = 5). Subjects received intranasal timothy grass pollen ( Phleum pratense P5 allergen), and serial samples of nasal mucosal lining fluid were taken by using synthetic absorptive matrix and by nasal lavage. Results Administration of anti–IL-13 on day 1 resulted in a significant decrease in IL-13 levels in synthetic absorptive matrix eluates compared with placebo (area under the curve 0-8 hours, change from baseline) during the late phase after nasal allergen challenge on day 5 ( P < .05) and day 7 ( P < .01). There were no apparent effects of anti–IL-13 treatment on nasal lavage eosinophil numbers or total nasal symptom scores versus placebo. However, in a subgroup with high late-phase IL-13 levels at screening, there was a trend for a decrease in total nasal symptom scores after nasal allergen challenge on day 5, when compared with subjects with low IL-13 levels ( P < .10). Nasal fluticasone caused suppression of IL-13 ( P < .05 on day 5) as well as IL-5 ( P < .01 on day 5) levels in the late phase compared with placebo. Conclusions Anti–IL-13 had specific pharmacodynamic action in this nasal allergen challenge model, causing profound inhibition of nasal lining fluid IL-13 responses. In addition, there was a possible effect of anti–IL-13 treatment on total nasal symptom scores in a subgroup with high late-phase nasal IL-13 levels at screening. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0091-6749 1097-6825 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.05.013 |