Loading…

Pre-transplant MELD and sodium MELD scores are poor predictors of graft failure and mortality after liver transplantation

Background Incorporating serum sodium concentrations into the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score may increase its sensitivity for identifying priority patients for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We, therefore, evaluated and compared the ability of the sodium MELD and MELD scores...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hepatology international 2011-09, Vol.5 (3), p.841-849
Main Authors: Cywinski, Jacek B., Mascha, Edward J., You, Jing, Sessler, Daniel I., Kapural, Leonardo, Argalious, Maged, Parker, Brian M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Incorporating serum sodium concentrations into the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score may increase its sensitivity for identifying priority patients for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We, therefore, evaluated and compared the ability of the sodium MELD and MELD scores to predict graft and patient survival after OLT. Methods The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry includes all US adult OLTs performed between January 2000 and August 2008. For 15,156 patients who met inclusion criteria, MELD score was calculated; for 6,193 patients whose serum sodium concentrations was between 120 and 135 mEq/dl, immediately before OLT, sodium MELD score was calculated. The corresponding hazard ratios (HR) for MELD and sodium MELD on graft and patient survival were assessed using the Cox proportional hazards regression models. The concordance probability estimate (CPE) was used to evaluate predictive ability of each time-to-event model. Results MELD and sodium MELD scores were both significant predictors in univariable Cox regression models for graft failure [HR (95% CI) for every 10 units increase in the predictor: 1.10 (1.04, 1.17), P  = 0.001, and 1.05 (1.00, 1.10), P  = 0.03, respectively], and for mortality (1.14 (1.07, 1.21), P  
ISSN:1936-0533
1936-0541
DOI:10.1007/s12072-011-9257-z