Loading…
Toxicity and bioaccumulation of copper and lead in five marine microalgae
On five marine microalgae with the same biovolume quantity ( Tetraselmis chuii, Rhodomonas salina, Chaetoceros sp., Isochrysis galbana (T-iso) and Nannochloropsis gaditana) 72-h exposure toxicity tests with copper and lead were performed. For both metals, 72-h EC50s showed T. chuii as the most toler...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecotoxicology and environmental safety 2009-07, Vol.72 (5), p.1503-1513 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | On five marine microalgae with the same biovolume quantity (
Tetraselmis chuii,
Rhodomonas salina,
Chaetoceros sp.,
Isochrysis galbana (T-iso) and
Nannochloropsis gaditana) 72-h exposure toxicity tests with copper and lead were performed. For both metals, 72-h EC50s showed
T. chuii as the most tolerant and
R. salina as one of the most sensitive. Besides copper and lead EC
50 concentrations, metal concentrations in solution and accumulated on/in the cell where also analysed.
T. chuii, the most tolerant species accumulated high copper concentrations (EC
50(Cu)=330
μg
L
−1; EC
50(Pb)=2600
μg
L
−1), and
R. salina the most sensitive to copper, accumulated the highest amount of this metal (EC
50(Cu)=50
μg
L
−1). Results of this study show that there is no specific relationship between cell tolerance and accumulated metal on/in the cell. On the other hand
, due to an established evidence of the influence of cellular density in microalgae toxicity tests, this effect was also studied. Results showed reduced EC
50 values when initial cellular densities decreased.
In this study, the term “toxic cellular quota” was used to express all data. This allowed, in a single expression, the combination of two parameters that clearly influence growth, cellular density and toxic concentration. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0147-6513 1090-2414 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2009.04.006 |