Loading…

Oral treatment for multiple sclerosis

Summary Background The armamentarium for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is increasing rapidly. Several oral treatments have shown benefit and will generate much interest because of the convenience of such administration. However, availability of convenient oral drugs...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Lancet neurology 2011-11, Vol.10 (11), p.1026-1034
Main Authors: Killestein, Joep, Dr, Rudick, Richard A, Prof, Polman, Chris H, Prof
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary Background The armamentarium for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is increasing rapidly. Several oral treatments have shown benefit and will generate much interest because of the convenience of such administration. However, availability of convenient oral drugs will not necessarily translate into clinical effectiveness and safety. Here, we provide an interim report about the mechanisms of action, and efficacy and safety results that have been reported since January, 2010, for five new oral drugs. Additionally, we draw attention to issues that neurologists and patients will encounter when considering the use of new oral drugs. Recent developments Positive results have been reported for five new oral drugs for RRMS—fingolimod, cladribine, teriflunomide, laquinimod, and dimethyl fumarate—in phase 3 studies; a few new oral drugs are likely to be approved for RRMS soon. Where next? Emerging oral treatments are ushering in a new era in the treatment of MS, providing not only new treatment options but also new challenges. Since data for some of the new drugs have not been reported in peer-reviewed journals yet and safety profiles are not yet fully developed, opinions about the use of these new oral drugs in practice are preliminary and tentative. Practice will evolve with time as information and experience accumulates. Of importance will be results from comparator trials, information about management of patients with breakthrough disease, results from long-term safety studies, and results of studies to assess the potential for neuroprotective effects of the new drugs.
ISSN:1474-4422
1474-4465
DOI:10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70228-9