Validity of maximum heart rate prediction equations for children and adolescents

• Published in: Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia 2011-08, Vol.97 (2), p.136-140
• Main Authors: Machado, Fabiana Andrade, Denadai, Benedito Sérgio
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Algorithms; Analysis of Variance; Child; Exercise Test - methods; Heart Rate - physiology; Humans; Male; Physical Exertion - physiology; Predictive Value of Tests; Reference Values; Reproducibility of Results
• ISSN: 1678-4170
• DOI: 10.1590/S0066-782X2011005000078

There are no studies in the literature to validate equations that predict maximum heart rate (HRmax) in children and adolescents. To analyze the validity of the HRmax predictive equations "220 - age" and "208 - (0.7 x age)" in boys aged 10 and 16. A progressive maximal exertion test was carried out in 69 apparently healthy boys aged 10 to 16. The initial test velocity was 9 km/h, with 1-km/h increments every three minutes. The test was maintained until maximum voluntary exertion was achieved, considering HRmax as the highest heart rate attained during the test. The measured HRmax was compared with the values predicted by the "220 - age" and "208 - (0.7 x age)" equations, using ANOVA for repeated measures. The mean values of HRmax (bpm) were: 200.2 ± 8.0 (measured), 207.4 ± 1.5 ("220 - age") and 199.2 ± 1.1 ("208 - (0.7 x age)"). The HRmax predicted by the "220 - age" equation was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than the measured HRmax and the HRmax predicted by the ("208 - (0.7 x age)") equation. The correlation between the measured HRmax and age was not statistically significant (r = 0.096; p > 0.05). The "220 - age" equation overestimated the measured HRmax and was not valid for this population. The "208 - (0.7 x age)" equation was valid for this population, showing results that were quite similar to those of measured HRmax. Future studies with larger sample sizes can verify whether the HRmax does not depend on age for this population, a situation in which the constant 200 bpm value would be more appropriate for HRmax.