Social Risk-Management Strategies in Pastoral Systems: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis

Pastoralists risk losing their livelihood overnight due to drought, disease, and other disasters. They employ different strategies to minimize these risks, including the following: Mobility, herd maximization, diversification, and social strategies. Social strategies are considered critical because...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cross-cultural research 2011-08, Vol.45 (3), p.286-317
Main Authors: Moritz, Mark, Giblin, Julia, Ciccone, Miranda, Davis, Andréa, Fuhrman, Jesse, Kimiaie, Masoumeh, Madzsar, Stefanie, Olson, Kyle, Senn, Matthew
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Causality
Client relationships
Comparative Analysis
Comparative studies
Disasters
Diseases
Diversification
Drought
Exchange
Exchange networks
Geographic Mobility
Herding
Livelihood
Mobility
Pastoral Societies
Pastoralism
Qualitative analysis
Qualitative research
Resilience
Risk
Risk management
Social networks
Strategies
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Pastoralists risk losing their livelihood overnight due to drought, disease, and other disasters. They employ different strategies to minimize these risks, including the following: Mobility, herd maximization, diversification, and social strategies. Social strategies are considered critical because they provide not only a safety net during disasters but also contribute to the resilience of pastoral societies by allowing pastoralists to rebuild herds after disasters. There is, however, much variation in social risk-management strategies (SRMS) across pastoral societies. To understand this variation, we conducted a comparative study of 20 pastoral societies from different socioeconomic, historical, and environmental settings. We used Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) to examine which causal configurations explain the variation in SRMS. This analytical approach helped us to identify four clusters of pastoral groups, in which different causal configurations are associated with exchange networks, patron—client relations, and noninstitutional SRMS.
ISSN:1069-3971
1552-3578
DOI:10.1177/1069397111402464