Loading…

Early truancy intervention: Results of an evaluation using a regression discontinuity design

This study evaluates the effectiveness of a truancy reduction program. A Regression Discontinuity design was used to assess attendance outcomes for 700 children. Approximately half received a case management intervention, while the other half received a warning letter, only. Truancy rates in the con...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Children and youth services review 2011-09, Vol.33 (9), p.1563-1572
Main Authors: Thomas, Johanna M., Lemieux, Catherine M., Rhodes, Judith L.F., Vlosky, Denese Ashbaugh
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study evaluates the effectiveness of a truancy reduction program. A Regression Discontinuity design was used to assess attendance outcomes for 700 children. Approximately half received a case management intervention, while the other half received a warning letter, only. Truancy rates in the control group remained at the pre-intervention levels, while truancy in the treatment group significantly declined ( p < .01). Successful case closure was associated with a reduction in truancy ( p < .001). The intervention was less effective with non-White children and with those who had been previously retained. Findings substantiate continued support for the intervention; however, additional resources should include culturally-responsive treatment approaches and academic enrichment programs. ► Regression Discontinuity Analysis for Truancy Program Evaluation. ► Truancy rates in the control group remained at the pre-intervention levels. ► Truancy in the treatment group significantly declined ( p < .01). ► Successful case closure was associated with a reduction in truancy ( p < .001). ► The intervention was less effective with non-White and previously retained children.
ISSN:0190-7409
1873-7765
DOI:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.03.021