Loading…

What is narrative therapy and what is it not? The usefulness of Q methodology to explore accounts of White and Epston's (1990) approach to narrative therapy

Objective. ‘What is narrative therapy and how do you do it?’ is a question that is repeatedly asked of narrative therapy, with little consistent response. This study aimed to explore and distil out the ‘common themes’ of practitioner definitions of White and Epston's approach to narrative thera...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical psychology and psychotherapy 2011-11, Vol.18 (6), p.486-497
Main Authors: Wallis, Jennifer, Burns, Jan, Capdevila, Rose
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective. ‘What is narrative therapy and how do you do it?’ is a question that is repeatedly asked of narrative therapy, with little consistent response. This study aimed to explore and distil out the ‘common themes’ of practitioner definitions of White and Epston's approach to narrative therapy. Design. This was an Internet‐based study involving current UK practitioners of this type of narrative therapy using a unique combination of a Delphi Panel and Q methodology. Method. A group of experienced practitioners were recruited into the Delphi Poll and were asked two questions about what narrative therapy is and is not, and what techniques are and are not employed. These data combined with other information formed the statements of a Q‐sort that was then administered to a wider range of narrative practitioners. Findings. The Delphi Panel agreed on a number of key points relating to the theory, politics and practice of narrative therapy. The Q‐sort produced eight distinct accounts of narrative therapy and a number of dimensions along which these different positions could be distinguished. These included narrative therapy as a political stance and integration with other approaches. Conclusions. For any therapeutic model to demonstrate its efficacy and attract proponents, an accepted definition of its components and practice should preferably be established. This study has provided some data for the UK application of White and Epston's narrative therapy, which may then assist in forming a firmer base for further research and practice. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Key Practitioner Message: • Narrative therapy and how it is carried out remain unclearly defined, which limits studies of the efficacy of this approach. • Experienced practitioners of narrative therapy were able to identify a set of core concepts, values and techniques over which there was some consensus. • This study also identified the different ‘positionings’ of narrative therapy that have contributed to its opacity and have highlighted the diversity in therapist practice.
ISSN:1063-3995
1099-0879
DOI:10.1002/cpp.723