Loading…

Randomized phase 2 sequencing and pharmacokinetic study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Aim:  This multicentre phase II trial examined the combination of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The effect of sequence administration was randomized and pharmacokinetics (PK) assessed. Methods:  Eligible patients had stage IIIB or IV or rec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology 2011-12, Vol.7 (4), p.376-384
Main Authors: MITCHELL, Paul L, BROAD, Adam, ROSENTHAL, Mark A, GALETTIS, Peter, ABRAHAM, Rick, BURNS, Ivon, CLARKE, Stephen, MILNER, Alvin, DIIULIO, Juliana, LINKS, Matthew
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim:  This multicentre phase II trial examined the combination of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The effect of sequence administration was randomized and pharmacokinetics (PK) assessed. Methods:  Eligible patients had stage IIIB or IV or recurrent NSCLC, no prior chemotherapy, World Health Organization performance status ≤2 and measurable disease. Treatment comprised: gemcitabine (1250 mg/m2) and oxaliplatin (70 mg/m2), each given on days 1 and 8 of a 21‐day cycle. Patients were randomized 1:1 to the sequencing of the two drugs for the duration of their treatment. The primary end‐point was response rate (RR). Secondary end‐points included progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), toxicity, PK and the effect of drug sequencing. Results:  A total of 46 patients were enrolled of whom 43 were evaluable for response. Overall 13 patients (30%) achieved a partial response, PFS was 4.2 months (95% CI 2.8–5.8 months), and OS was 6.8 months (95% CI 4.4–10.1 months). There was only one case of grade 3 neurosensory toxicity despite a median cumulative oxaliplatin dose in excess of 500 mg/m2. No differences in clinical or PK end‐points were observed between the two different sequencing arms. Conclusion:  This oxaliplatin and gemcitabine schedule has shown activity in advanced NSCLC with modest toxicity. Neither clinical nor PK outcomes were influenced by the sequencing of these agents, although definite conclusions are limited by small patient numbers. The favorable toxicity profile of this doublet, in light of an encouraging RR, warrants its further investigation in NSCLC.
ISSN:1743-7555
1743-7563
DOI:10.1111/j.1743-7563.2011.01390.x