Comparison of GRCop-84 to Other Cu Alloys with High Thermal Conductivities

The mechanical properties of six highly conductive copper alloys, GRCop-84, AMZIRC, GlidCop Al-15, Cu-1Cr-0.1Zr, Cu-0.9Cr, and NARloy-Z were compared. Tests were done on as-received hard drawn material, and after a heat treatment designed to simulate a brazing operation at 935 °C. In the as-received...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of materials engineering and performance 2008-08, Vol.17 (4), p.594-606
Main Authors: de Groh, Henry C., Ellis, David L., Loewenthal, William S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Alloys
Aluminum
BRAZING
Characterization and Evaluation of Materials
Copper
COPPER ALLOYS (40 TO 99.3 CU)
Copper base alloys
Corrosion and Coatings
CREEP PROPERTIES
ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY
Engineering Design
HEAT TREATING
Heat treatment
Materials Science
MECHANICAL PROPERTIES
PROPERTIES
Quality Control
Reliability
Safety and Risk
Strength
Tribology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The mechanical properties of six highly conductive copper alloys, GRCop-84, AMZIRC, GlidCop Al-15, Cu-1Cr-0.1Zr, Cu-0.9Cr, and NARloy-Z were compared. Tests were done on as-received hard drawn material, and after a heat treatment designed to simulate a brazing operation at 935 °C. In the as-received condition AMZIRC, GlidCop Al-15, Cu-1Cr-0.1Zr, and Cu-0.9Cr had excellent strengths at temperatures below 500 °C. However, the brazing heat treatment substantially decreased the mechanical properties of AMZIRC, Cu-1Cr-0.1Zr, Cu-0.9Cr, and NARloy-Z. The properties of GlidCop Al-15 and GRCop-84 were not significantly affected by the heat treatment. Thus there appear to be advantages to GRCop-84 over AMZIRC, Cu-1Cr-0.1Zr, Cu-0.9Cr, and NARloy-Z if use or processing temperatures greater than 500 °C are expected. Ductility was the lowest in GlidCop Al-15 and Cu-0.9Cr; reduction in area was particularly low in GlidCop Al-15 above 500 °C, and as-received Cu-0.9Cr was brittle between 500 and 650 °C. Tensile creep tests were done at 500 and 650 °C; the creep properties of GRCop-84 were superior to those of brazed AMZIRC, Cu-1Cr-0.1Zr, Cu-0.9Cr, and NARloy-Z. In the brazed condition, GRCop-84 was superior to the other alloys due to its greater strength and creep resistance (compared to AMZIRC, Cu-1Cr-0.1Zr, Cu-0.9Cr, and NARloy-Z) and ductility (compared to GlidCop Al-15).
ISSN:1059-9495
1544-1024
DOI:10.1007/s11665-007-9175-3