Guidelines on the facilities required for minor surgical procedures and minimal access interventions

• Published in: The Journal of hospital infection 2012-02, Vol.80 (2), p.103-109
• Main Authors: Humphreys, H, Coia, J.E, Stacey, A, Thomas, M, Belli, A.-M, Hoffman, P, Jenks, P, Mackintosh, C.A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Ambulatory Surgical Procedures - methods; Biological and medical sciences; Cross Infection - prevention & control; General aspects; Health Facilities - standards; Health Facility Administration - standards; Human infectious diseases. Experimental studies and models; Humans; Infectious Disease; Infectious diseases; Medical sciences; Minor surgery; Minor Surgical Procedures - methods; Operating theatres; Primary care; Primary Health Care - methods; Surgical site infection; Ventilation
• ISSN: 0195-6701; 1532-2939
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.11.010

Summary There have been many changes in healthcare provision in recent years, including the delivery of some surgical services in primary care or in day surgery centres, which were previously provided by acute hospitals. Developments in the fields of interventional radiology and cardiology have further expanded the range and complexity of procedures undertaken in these settings. In the face of these changes there is a need to define from an infection prevention and control perspective the basic physical requirements for facilities in which such surgical procedures may be carried out. Under the auspices of the Healthcare Infection Society, we have developed the following recommendations for those designing new facilities or upgrading existing facilities. These draw upon best practice, available evidence, other guidelines where appropriate, and expert consensus to provide sensible and feasible advice. An attempt is also made to define minimal access interventions and minor surgical procedures. For minimal access interventions, including interventional radiology, new facilities should be mechanically ventilated to achieve 15 air changes per hour but natural ventilation is satisfactory for minor procedures. All procedures should involve a checklist and operators should be appropriately trained. There is also a need for prospective surveillance to accurately determine the post-procedure infection rate. Finally, there is a requirement for appropriate applied research to develop the evidence base required to support subsequent iterations of this guidance.