Loading…
Timing of thoracolomber spine stabilization in trauma patients; impact on neurological outcome and clinical course. A real prospective (rct) randomized controlled study
Objective Optimal timing of stabilization for spinal injuries is discussed controversially. The goal of this study is to investigate the neurological recovery and its influencing factors in thoracolumbar spine fractures after surgical decompression and stabilization within 8 h of spinal cord injury...
Saved in:
Published in: | Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery 2008-09, Vol.128 (9), p.959-966 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objective
Optimal timing of stabilization for spinal injuries is discussed controversially. The goal of this study is to investigate the neurological recovery and its influencing factors in thoracolumbar spine fractures after surgical decompression and stabilization within 8 h of spinal cord injury versus surgery which is performed between 3 and 15 days.
Methods
Twenty-seven patients undergoing thoracolumbar stabilization with neurological deficit for an acute thoracolumbar spinal injury at the level of Th8-L2 vertebra at Selcuk University between March 2004 and December 2006 were recorded. Patients with neurological deficity and medically stable for surgery underwent immediate stabilization within 8 h defined as group I (
n
= 12) and patients underwent operation in 3–15 days after thoracolumbar injury were defined as group II (
n
= 15). Patients were assessed for neurologic deficit and improvement as defined by the scoring system of American spinal injury association (ASIA).
Results
In spite of comparable demographic data, patients in group I had a significantly shorter overall hospital and intensive care unit stay and had lesser systemic complications such as pneumonia and also exhibited better neurological improvement than group II (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0936-8051 1434-3916 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00402-007-0518-1 |