Loading…

Multiple TGF-[beta] Superfamily Signals Modulate the Adult Drosophila Immune Response

TGF-[beta] superfamily signals play complex roles in regulation of tissue repair and inflammation in mammals . Drosophila melanogaster is a well-established model for the study of innate immune function [ and ] and wound healing [,. and ]. Here, we explore the role and regulation of two TGF-[beta] s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Current biology 2011-10, Vol.21 (19), p.1672-1677
Main Authors: Clark, Rebecca I, Woodcock, Katie J, Geissmann, Frederic, Trouillet, Celine, Dionne, Marc S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:TGF-[beta] superfamily signals play complex roles in regulation of tissue repair and inflammation in mammals . Drosophila melanogaster is a well-established model for the study of innate immune function [ and ] and wound healing [,. and ]. Here, we explore the role and regulation of two TGF-[beta] superfamily members, dawdle and decapentaplegic (dpp), in response to wounding and infection in adult Drosophila. We find that both TGF-[beta] signals exhibit complex regulation in response to wounding and infection, each is expressed in a subset of phagocytes, and each inhibits a specific arm of the immune response. dpp is rapidly activated by wounds and represses the production of antimicrobial peptides; flies lacking dpp function display persistent, strong antimicrobial peptide expression after even a small wound. dawdle, in contrast, is activated by Gram-positive bacterial infection but repressed by Gram-negative infection or wounding; its role is to limit infection-induced melanization. Flies lacking dawdle function exhibit melanization even when uninfected. Together, these data imply a model in which the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) dpp is an important inhibitor of inflammation following sterile injury whereas the activin-like dawdle determines the nature of the induced immune response.
ISSN:0960-9822
DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.048