Loading…
Direct measurement of the interaction force between immunostimulatory CpG-DNA and TLR9 fusion protein
The specific interaction between human Toll‐like receptor 9 (TLR9)–ectodomain (ECD)–fusion protein and immunostimulatory CpG–DNA was measured using force spectroscopy. Flexible tethers were used between receptors and surface as well as between DNA and atomic force microscope tip to make efficient re...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of molecular recognition 2012-02, Vol.25 (2), p.74-81 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The specific interaction between human Toll‐like receptor 9 (TLR9)–ectodomain (ECD)–fusion protein and immunostimulatory CpG–DNA was measured using force spectroscopy. Flexible tethers were used between receptors and surface as well as between DNA and atomic force microscope tip to make efficient recognition studies possible. The molecular recognition forces detected are in the range of 50 to 150 ± 20 pN at the used force‐loading rates, and the molecular interaction probability was much reduced when the receptors were blocked with free CpG–DNA. A linear increase of the unbinding force with the logarithm of the loading rate was found over the range 0.1 to 30 nN/s. This indicates a single potential barrier characterizing the energy landscape and no intermediate state for the unbinding pathway of CpG–DNA from the TLR9–ECD. Two important kinetic parameters for CpG–DNA interaction with TLR9–ECD were determined from the force‐loading rate dependency: an off‐rate of koff = 0.14 ± 0.10 s‐1 and a binding interaction length of xβ = 0.30 ± 0.03 nm, which are consistent with literature values. Various models for the molecular interaction of this innate immune receptor binding to CpG–DNA are discussed. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0952-3499 1099-1352 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jmr.2156 |