Loading…

The effect of low-fidelity endoscopic sinus surgery simulators on surgical skill

Background: Surgical training models are being increasingly used to provide an environment for surgical trainees to improve their skills without risk to patients. This study uses previously validated, inexpensive, low‐fidelity training models to determine how pretraining affects endoscopic sinus sur...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International forum of allergy & rhinology 2012-01, Vol.2 (1), p.20-26
Main Authors: Wais, Marta, Ooi, Eng, Leung, Randy M., Vescan, Allan D., Lee, John, Witterick, Ian J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Surgical training models are being increasingly used to provide an environment for surgical trainees to improve their skills without risk to patients. This study uses previously validated, inexpensive, low‐fidelity training models to determine how pretraining affects endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) skills. Methods: Fourteen Otolaryngology residents were randomized to 1 of 2 groups that were stratified for training level. The first group took part in a pretraining session where they practiced on all 5 different modules whereas the second group did not receive any pretraining. The following day, all participants took part in a cadaveric ESS course. Participants were instructed to complete a set of tasks and their performances were videotaped. The videos were then evaluated using a Global Rating Scale (GRS) and a Task‐Specific Checklist (TSC). The performances of those who trained using the models were compared to the performances of those who did not. Results: The intervention (pretraining) group performed better than the nonintervention (no pretraining) group on the cadaveric ESS tasks (p < 0.05). As well, there was a statistical difference between the senior residents who had the pretraining with the simulator models performing better than those who did not. Conclusion: The modules appear to have made a positive impact on ESS skills. These low‐cost, easily‐constructed training modules have the potential to be integrated into Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery resident training. Assessment of long‐term training effects with a larger number of participants is planned for future studies. © 2011 ARS‐AAOA, LLC.
ISSN:2042-6976
2042-6984
DOI:10.1002/alr.20093