FDI AND TAXATION: A META-STUDY

In this paper we extend former meta‐analyses on FDI and taxation in three ways. First, we add 16 recent publications. Second, we code additional meta‐regressor variables addressing important issues in research on FDI and taxation. Third, we refer to the sophisticated meta‐analytical methodology and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of economic surveys 2011-04, Vol.25 (2), p.233-272
Main Authors: Feld, Lars P., Heckemeyer, Jost H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Analysis
Corporate income taxation
Economic theory
Enterprises
Fiscal policy
Foreign direct investment
Foreign investment
International investment
Meta-analysis
Regression analysis
Regulation
Studies
Tax rates
Tax regulations
Taxation
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this paper we extend former meta‐analyses on FDI and taxation in three ways. First, we add 16 recent publications. Second, we code additional meta‐regressor variables addressing important issues in research on FDI and taxation. Third, we refer to the sophisticated meta‐analytical methodology and present a coherent strategy to choose the meta‐regression estimator most suitable for the meta‐data at hand. As compared to prior surveys, the meta‐analysis is thus based on a much broader methodological basis and a considerably richer meta‐data set. The median tax semi‐elasticity of FDI based on 704 primary estimates is 2.49 in absolute terms. The precision weighted average of the full sample of semi‐elasticities is 2.55, again in absolute terms. Moreover, our meta‐analysis shows that there is a publication bias in the primary literature. Meta‐regressions show that studies based on aggregate data report systematically larger semi‐elasticities than firm‐level analyses, that integrating bilateral tax regulations into effective tax rates leads to more effective measurement of adverse tax incentives on foreign investment, and that tax effects are not compensated by public spending.
ISSN:0950-0804
1467-6419
DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00674.x