Loading…

Association between education in EOL care and variability in EOL practice: a survey of ICU physicians

Purpose This study investigated the association between physician education in EOL and variability in EOL practice, as well as the differences between beliefs and practices regarding EOL in the ICU. Methods Physicians from 11 ICUs at a university hospital completed a survey presenting a patient in a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Intensive care medicine 2012-03, Vol.38 (3), p.404-412
Main Authors: Forte, Daniel Neves, Vincent, Jean Louis, Velasco, Irineu Tadeu, Park, Marcelo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose This study investigated the association between physician education in EOL and variability in EOL practice, as well as the differences between beliefs and practices regarding EOL in the ICU. Methods Physicians from 11 ICUs at a university hospital completed a survey presenting a patient in a vegetative state with no family or advance directives. Questions addressed approaches to EOL care, as well physicians’ personal, professional and EOL educational characteristics. Results The response rate was 89%, with 105 questionnaires analyzed. Mean age was 38 ± 8 years, with a mean of 14 ± 7 years since graduation. Physicians who did not apply do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders were less likely to have attended EOL classes than those who applied written DNR orders [0/7 vs. 31/47, OR = 0.549 (0.356–0.848), P  = 0.001]. Physicians who involved nurses in the decision-making process were more likely to be ICU specialists [17/22 vs. 46/83, OR = 4.1959 (1.271–13.845), P  = 0.013] than physicians who made such decisions among themselves or referred to ethical or judicial committees. Physicians who would apply “full code” had less often read about EOL [3/22 vs. 11/20, OR = 0.0939 (0.012–0.710), P  = 0.012] and had less interest in discussing EOL [17/22 vs. 20/20, OR = 0.210 (0.122–0.361), P  
ISSN:0342-4642
1432-1238
DOI:10.1007/s00134-011-2400-4