Activity theory as an activist and interventionist theory

This article presents arguments used in current discussions on potential shortcomings of contemporary works within activity theory concerning subjectivity and the use of conceptual models such as the triangular representation of the activity system. It documents the history of activity theory as an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Theory & psychology 2011-10, Vol.21 (5), p.571-597
Main Author: Sannino, Annalisa
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Activism
Conceptualization
Contemporary problems
Historical analysis
Historical Development
Intervention
Interventionism
Psychology
Social Change
Social theory
Stimuli
Subjectivity
Theory
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article presents arguments used in current discussions on potential shortcomings of contemporary works within activity theory concerning subjectivity and the use of conceptual models such as the triangular representation of the activity system. It documents the history of activity theory as an activist and interventionist theory. It suggests that advances in activity theory depend on the ability of those within this framework to establish fruitful connections between the classic heritage and challenging possibilities of societal change. The main arguments of the critiques are examined in this historical perspective. Combined with design and implementation of material transformations, both the models and the voices of the subjects act as mediators and are embedded in collective change efforts. The article indicates a possible direction to reorient the current discussions toward interventionist methods developed within the framework of activity theory, namely the Change Laboratory, the Clinic of Activity, and the Fifth Dimension.
ISSN:0959-3543
1461-7447
DOI:10.1177/0959354311417485