Loading…
Not Available
INTRODUCTIONThe Lower Extremity Functional Scale was translated into Canadian French in 2006; the translated version was titled Échelle fonctionnelle des membres inférieurs (EFMI). The construct validity and reliability of the EFMI have not been examined. OBJECTIVETo examine the test-retest reliabil...
Saved in:
Published in: | Physiotherapy Canada 2011-01, Vol.63 (2), p.249-255 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | fre |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | INTRODUCTIONThe Lower Extremity Functional Scale was translated into Canadian French in 2006; the translated version was titled Échelle fonctionnelle des membres inférieurs (EFMI). The construct validity and reliability of the EFMI have not been examined. OBJECTIVETo examine the test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity of the EFMI. METHODOLOGYThirty-four participants who had undergone surgery or had an injury to the lower limb were asked to fill out a demographic questionnaire and complete the EFMI after their initial assessment while hospitalized. They completed the EFMI a second time within 72 hours. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and the kappa coefficient were chosen to examine the test-retest reliability of the EFMI, and Cronbach's alpha coefficient was calculated to assess internal consistency. A factor analysis was conducted to examine construct validity by determining the number of constructs and their meanings. RESULTSThe ICC value was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88-0.96), and Cronbach's alpha was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-0.99). The factor analysis revealed that all elements of the EFMI share one principal construct. CONCLUSIONThe results demonstrate that the French-Canadian version of the EFMI is a unidimensional tool with excellent test-retest reliability. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0300-0508 |
DOI: | 10.3138/ptc.2010-12F |