Loading…

Passively mobile communicating machines that use restricted space

We propose a new theoretical model for passively mobile wireless sensor networks, called PM, standing for passively mobile machines. The main modification w.r.t. the population protocol model (Angluin et al., 2006) [30] is that agents now, instead of being automata, are Turing Machines. We provide g...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Theoretical computer science 2011-10, Vol.412 (46), p.6469-6483
Main Authors: Chatzigiannakis, Ioannis, Michail, Othon, Nikolaou, Stavros, Pavlogiannis, Andreas, Spirakis, Paul G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We propose a new theoretical model for passively mobile wireless sensor networks, called PM, standing for passively mobile machines. The main modification w.r.t. the population protocol model (Angluin et al., 2006) [30] is that agents now, instead of being automata, are Turing Machines. We provide general definitions for unbounded memories, but we are mainly interested in computations upper-bounded by plausible space limitations. However, we prove that our results hold for more general cases. We focus on complete interaction graphs and define the complexity classes PMSPACE(f(n)) parametrically, consisting of all predicates that are stably computable by some PM protocol that uses O(f(n)) memory in each agent. We provide a protocol that generates unique identifiers from scratch only by using O(logn) memory, and use it to provide an exact characterization of the classes PMSPACE(f(n)) when f(n)=Ω(logn): they are precisely the classes of all symmetric predicates inNSPACE(nf(n)). As a consequence, we obtain a space hierarchy of the PM model when the memory bounds are Ω(logn). We next explore the computability of the PM model when the protocols use o(loglogn) space per machine and prove that SEM=PMSPACE(f(n)) when f(n)=o(loglogn), where SEM denotes the class of the semilinear predicates. Finally, we establish that the minimal space requirement for the computation of non-semilinear predicates is O(loglogn).
ISSN:0304-3975
1879-2294
DOI:10.1016/j.tcs.2011.07.001