Loading…

EOQ models for a coordinated two-level international supply chain considering imperfect items and environmental impact

For a two-level supply chain, models are presented to determine the optimal production–shipment policy for items with imperfect quality in three different scenarios: (a) both the vendor and the buyer are in the same country, (b) the vendor and the buyer are in different countries where the stochasti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of production economics 2011-11, Vol.134 (1), p.151-158
Main Authors: Wahab, M.I.M., Mamun, S.M.H., Ongkunaruk, P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:For a two-level supply chain, models are presented to determine the optimal production–shipment policy for items with imperfect quality in three different scenarios: (a) both the vendor and the buyer are in the same country, (b) the vendor and the buyer are in different countries where the stochastic behavior of the exchange rate between the two countries is modeled using a mean-reverting process, and (c) environmental impact is incorporated in determining the optimal production–shipment policy by taking into account the fixed and variable carbon emission costs. The objective is to minimize the total expected cost per unit time. For each scenario, considering equal shipment size, the total expected cost per unit time is derived and the solution procedure is proposed. Numerical examples are presented and the results are discussed. ► A production–shipment coordination policy for a two-level supply chain is studied. ► It is assumed that there is a percentage of defective in the supplied items. ► Three different supply chains are investigated: ► 1. Domestic; 2. International; and 3. International considering CO 2 emission costs. ► Coordination policy changes with exchange rate volatility and CO 2 emission costs.
ISSN:0925-5273
1873-7579
DOI:10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.06.008