Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of self-expanding metallic stents as a bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for malignant left-sided large bowel obstruction

• Published in: British journal of surgery 2012-04, Vol.99 (4), p.469-476
• Main Authors: Tan, C. J., Dasari, B. V. M., Gardiner, K.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anastomosis, Surgical; Anastomotic Leak - etiology; Bias; Biological and medical sciences; Colonic Diseases - surgery; Colostomy - statistics & numerical data; Emergency Treatment - methods; Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen; General aspects; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Intestinal Obstruction - surgery; Medical sciences; Miscellaneous; Other diseases. Semiology; Public health. Hygiene; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Reoperation - statistics & numerical data; Stents; Stomach. Duodenum. Small intestine. Colon. Rectum. Anus; Surgical Wound Infection - etiology; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 0007-1323; 1365-2168
• DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8689

Background: Use of self‐expanding metallic stents (SEMS) as a bridge to surgery has been suggested as an alternative management for acute malignant left‐sided colonic obstruction, as emergency surgery has a high risk of morbidity and mortality. This meta‐analysis evaluated high‐quality evidence comparing preoperative SEMS with emergency surgery. Methods: Relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed (1990–2011). Primary outcomes were primary anastomosis, stoma and in‐hospital mortality rates. Secondary outcomes included anastomotic leak, 30‐day reoperation and surgical‐site infection rates. Results: Four RCTs with 234 patients were included. Technical and clinical success rates for stenting were 70·7 per cent (82 of 116) and 69·0 per cent (80 of 116) respectively. The clinical perforation rate was 6·9 per cent (8 of 116) and the silent perforation rate 14 per cent (11 of 77). SEMS intervention resulted in significantly higher successful primary anastomosis (risk ratio (RR) 1·58, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·22 to 2·04; P < 0·001) and lower overall stoma (RR 0·71, 0·56 to 0·89; P = 0·004) rates. There was no difference in primary anastomosis, permanent stoma, in‐hospital mortality, anastomotic leak, 30‐day reoperation and surgical‐site infection rates. Three trials were stopped prematurely, one because the emergency surgery group had a significantly increased anastomotic leak rate, and two others because of stent‐related complications and increased 30‐day morbidity following SEMS management. Conclusion: Technical and clinical success rates for stenting were lower than expected. SEMS is associated with a high incidence of clinical and silent perforation. However, as a bridge to surgery, SEMS has higher successful primary anastomosis and lower overall stoma rates, with no significant difference in complications or mortality. Copyright © 2012 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Successful in two‐thirds