Loading…
Subjective risk vs. objective risk can lead to different post-cesarean birth decisions based on multiattribute modeling
Abstract Objective To compare birth recommendations for pregnant women with a prior cesarean produced from a decision model using absolute risks vs. one using subjective interpretation of the same risks: (1) a multiattribute decision model based on patient prioritization of risks (subjective risk) a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of clinical epidemiology 2011, Vol.64 (1), p.67-78 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Abstract Objective To compare birth recommendations for pregnant women with a prior cesarean produced from a decision model using absolute risks vs. one using subjective interpretation of the same risks: (1) a multiattribute decision model based on patient prioritization of risks (subjective risk) and (2) a hybrid model that used absolute risks (objective risk). Study Design and Setting The subjective risk multiattribute model used the Analytic Hierarchy Process to elicit priorities for maternal risks, neonatal risks, and the delivery experience from 96 postnatal women with a prior cesarean. The hybrid model combined the priorities for delivery experience obtained in the first model with the unadjusted absolute risk values. Results The multiattribute model generated more recommendations for repeat cesarean delivery than the hybrid model: 73% vs. 18%, ( P -value |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0895-4356 1878-5921 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.011 |