Loading…
What goes around, comes around
One of the fundamental problems with MRP II, as it was generally ascribed to, had to do with the issue of capacity planning. But finite capacity planning was never embraced by the software industry and leading consultants as anything more than a nice idea - a theory. While Just-in-time (JIT) invento...
Saved in:
Published in: | Manufacturing Systems 1999-11, Vol.17 (11), p.53 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | One of the fundamental problems with MRP II, as it was generally ascribed to, had to do with the issue of capacity planning. But finite capacity planning was never embraced by the software industry and leading consultants as anything more than a nice idea - a theory. While Just-in-time (JIT) inventory practices were portrayed first as a competitor and then a threat to MRP II, it was ultimately subsumed as a critical complement to it. JIT was followed by computer-integrated management as the holy grail of manufacturing in the mid-1980s. The definitions behind each of these waves of high-flying banners seemed to get less specific - and grew more distant from technology. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1554-3404 |