Loading…
DELVING BENEATH THE SURFACE
Wheel impact load detectors (WILD) are commonly used to identify high-impact wheels for removal. However, the majority of broken wheels fail in service absent of high impacts as measured by WILD. While WILD is effective for finding out-of-round (OOR) wheels, it does not serve well at identifying whe...
Saved in:
Published in: | Railway Age 2018-07, Vol.219 (7), p.31-31 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Wheel impact load detectors (WILD) are commonly used to identify high-impact wheels for removal. However, the majority of broken wheels fail in service absent of high impacts as measured by WILD. While WILD is effective for finding out-of-round (OOR) wheels, it does not serve well at identifying wheels with purely internal cracks. Wheels that break in service more often develop from subsurface discontinuities that do not affect the surface of the wheel until the wheel breaks; WILD is not the technology of choice for finding internal cracks. The mechanism of cracked wheel failure is quite different than OOR development. With internal discontinuities, fatigue cracks grow from the continuous cyclical loading that wheels undergo, particularly just below the tread where stresses are highest. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0033-8826 2161-511X |