Loading…

District Court Rules That Same-Sex Married Couples May File Joint Returns

A federal district court in Massachusetts recently rendered an important decision in the continuing legal conflict over same-sex marriage. In Gill v Office of Personnel Management, No 09-10909-JLT (D. Mass. 7/8/10), a district just held that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act, P.I. 104-199 (DO...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Tax Adviser 2010-11, Vol.41 (11), p.751
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A federal district court in Massachusetts recently rendered an important decision in the continuing legal conflict over same-sex marriage. In Gill v Office of Personnel Management, No 09-10909-JLT (D. Mass. 7/8/10), a district just held that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act, P.I. 104-199 (DOMA), is unconstitutional, violating equal protection principles of the Fifth Amendment's Due Process clause. If this decision is ultimately upheld, same-sex married couples will be allowed many of the same federal benefits afforded to their heterosexual married counterparts - at least within Massachusetts, the jurisdiction of the court - including the ability to file joint federal income tax returns. The plaintiffs in Gill v Office of Personnel Management - seven same-sex married couples and three survivors of same-sex spouses - sought to challenge the constitutionality of DOMA. The judge ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, finding that the government had no basis for denying benefits to same-sex married couples. In addition, the court found that Congress had no legitimate interest in applying a uniform definition of marriage for purposes of determining federal rights, benefits, and privileges. Thus, the plaintiffs were entitled to the federal benefits they sought. This would include allowing them to file joint federal income tax returns.
ISSN:0039-9957