Loading…

A longitudinal comparison of consumer-directed and agency-directed personal assistance service programmes among persons with physical disabilities

Purpose. To compare outcomes for persons who were enrolled in an agency-directed personal assistance services (PAS) programme and then changed to a consumer-directed PAS programme. Method. A convenience sample was used for this longitudinal study. In-home interviews were conducted by a trained data...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Disability and rehabilitation 2008, Vol.30 (9), p.689-695
Main Authors: Clark, Mary J., Hagglund, Kristofer J., Sherman, Ashley K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose. To compare outcomes for persons who were enrolled in an agency-directed personal assistance services (PAS) programme and then changed to a consumer-directed PAS programme. Method. A convenience sample was used for this longitudinal study. In-home interviews were conducted by a trained data collector from April 2000 to December 2001. Results. Participants reported more satisfaction and safety with personal assistance, and fewer unmet needs after receiving consumer-directed services than after receiving agency-directed services. Other variables related to outcomes included race and ethnicity, employment, functional status, unmet needs, and the level of confidence in obtaining help if assistance is unavailable. Participants (74%) also reported high rates of unmet needs in the past month. Conclusions. Consumer-directed PAS enhances outcomes for many persons with disabilities. Self-reported outcomes are affected by many factors that could be addressed in PAS program development.
ISSN:0963-8288
1464-5165
DOI:10.1080/09638280701463878